Comments
Prepare For Robotic Warfare, Warns CNAS
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
1/30/2014 | 7:59:28 AM
Re: vulnerabilities?
Thanks jgherbert for sharing this link.  Interesting to read something close to the original story...and how much you can't trust what you read on the Internet (in this case, one estimate that said NASA spent $12B. Talk about inflated stories.  Haha.
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
1/29/2014 | 10:32:42 PM
Re: vulnerabilities?
Haha ;-) I'll be the boring one to link to the trth behind the old joke:

 

http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp

 

There is a truth to the concept that military technology trickles down, so investment is good in theory, but figuring out where to focus funds must be a nightmare as those funds cannot be endless.

 

As mentioned earlier, there is a sight feel of being sponsored by a military vendor! ;-)
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
1/29/2014 | 4:50:01 PM
Re: vulnerabilities?
There's an old joke that when NASA astronauts discovered pens didn't work in zero-gravity environments, engineers spent $2 million (unconfirmed) developing a pen that finally did work.  The Russians solved the problem for less than $1 -- they used a pencil. Does the US overspend? Absolutely. Then again, that's partly because of Congressmen preserving jobs back home.  And let's not lose track of the fact that some of the advances we take for granted started because of the ability of the military to experiment.

 
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
1/29/2014 | 4:47:52 PM
Re: vulnerabilities?
There's an old joke that when NASA astronauts discovered pens didn't work in zero-gravity environments, engineers spent $2 million (unconfirmed) developing a pen that finally did work.  The Russians solved the problem for less than $1 -- they used a pencil. Does the US overspend? Absolutely. Then again, that's partly because of Congressmen preserving jobs back home.  And let's not lose track of the fact that some of the advances we take for granted started because of the ability of the military to experiment.

 
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
1/29/2014 | 10:01:29 AM
Re: vulnerabilities?
This report sounds like it was sponsored by defense contractors: robots are expensive, therefore we need lots more of them! Otherwise the military balance will be disrupted. What military balance? According to this story in the Washington Post, the United States spent more on the military budget in 2011 than the next 13 countries combined. Cuts have been made since, but our military expenditures still put us far ahead of any potential opponent.
SaneIT
50%
50%
SaneIT,
User Rank: Ninja
1/29/2014 | 9:12:45 AM
Re: vulnerabilities?
I've thought about this as well.  Then I realized how many airborne drones we have over other countries that should have enough technology to bring one down and we don't hear about that happening.  Part of the strategy is to keep the robots out of harms way the same we do with soldiers not actively engaged in fighting.  I think another reason we haven't seen high energy microwave weapons used is the whole high energy part.  It's not like they are going to retrofit radar towers to shoot down drones and it would be a game of cat and mouse.  If a drone spots a truck aiming at it chances are the truck will disappear before the drone falls from the sky.
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
1/28/2014 | 12:01:25 PM
Re: vulnerabilities?
I agree. High-energy microwave weapons are the big unsung military story. This sort of attack fries most sorts of IC's caught in their path, with the possible exception of Gallium-Arsenide. That's fried, destroyed, and not temporarily disabled. Given the potential of this type of weapon, it's absolutely amazing how little it is talked about.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
1/28/2014 | 11:56:35 AM
Re: vulnerabilities?
You have to wonder about the hacking possibilities, too. The security challenges here are cutting edge.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
1/27/2014 | 4:20:54 PM
vulnerabilities?
How well will such robots be shielded against electronic attacks that fry their circuits? When the robots come, I expect it won't be long before high-energy microwave weapons render them inoperable.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.