Comments
Open Hardware Is Like Linux: True Or False?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
2/3/2014 | 9:45:27 AM
Re: WIld card
@jgherbert - IT at some point has to become like more mature engineering disciplines, where a standard is the default and proprietary and specialized options have to be justified by offering an amount of benefit in line with not only the upfront but ongoing cost. You don't see an architectural engineering team deciding that 1,500 interior doors in an office high-rise won't be a standard opening. They might, however, decide that it's worthwhile to make the front door of the building custom.

Why should a datacenter be different? The basic building blocks - servers, storage, networking - should default to being cookie cutter. IT should think carefully about where it's worth adding proprietary or in-house-developed elements. 

We recently did a survey on exactly this topic: http://reports.informationweek.com/abstract/6/10096/Data-Center/Research:-Data-Center-Debate:-Standardization-vs.-Specialization.html

 
Li Tan
50%
50%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
2/3/2014 | 1:48:29 AM
Re: WIld card
I agree - the hardware will take longer time to morph than hardware. You cannot simply ask your customer to abolish the old and legacy hardware in one night. There is ROI and payback period issue for hardware investment. The connector is especially a difficult thing to handle - the interface of various hardware pieces will not get fit to each other without step-by-step evolution. The Open Hardware is a good idea but it won't prevail in the short term. 
MarkHaysHarris
IW Pick
100%
0%
MarkHaysHarris,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/1/2014 | 10:07:18 PM
Open Hardware is Similar to . . .
. . . the FOSS movement which produced Gnu/Linux.

 

No, of course not, Open Hardware is not like Linux.  Seriously?

 

The Open Hardware movement is similar in many respects to the free and open source software movement that produced the Linux kernel and the GNU system. 

The point regarding vendor lock-in is paramount. The community at large is sick-n-tired of vendors like NVidia, Broadcom, and others, who without regard for the free development community to "lock-out" software or hardware driver developers from certain platforms (Gnu/Linux, &c) forcing "lock-in" to other platforms... the 21st century has no patience with this working into the future.

The second point that needs to be explored is how much should "we the users" have as input to the hardware development process?  At a bare minimum we need to know how the device works, and have clear and concise APIs for application and kernel development.  ---no more proprietary firmware (we want the source) and no more propietary kernel blobs... the frimware does not belong in the kernel, period. If its not in the device itself, put it in a file, and give us the source.

And the thrid point is that we need hardware standards.  Everyone is sick-n-tired of fourteen different wifi card|standards and several different video standards.  We need industry standard open wifi and open vidieo (audio). 

Open hardware is important, but its not like the Linux kernel.  Gnu/Linux is open,  and the hardware|firmware needs to be open too.  If that is what is meant by "like Linux," well, ok...

 

Cheers
anon6063359013
50%
50%
anon6063359013,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/1/2014 | 3:03:28 PM
Re: Hey, I'm a tech enthusiastic
Just wanted to comment that i would not use the phrase " The goal is to reduce vendor lock-in" but  insted at  would say "  The goal is to offer an alternative ... my point is that openess should not look like a war of hate against close sources , i believe that both open and close source can coexist and everyone is to make thier choices, im just saying on my broken english, bear with me please, im spanish speaking  
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
2/1/2014 | 1:17:47 PM
Re: WIld card
Once you're down a road where all of your widgets have to fit one kind of connector, whether it was "open source" or not, there's now a cost to change the connector to adapt to a different design of a widget. Perhaps simplistic, but physical hardware connectivity doesn't seem as easy to modify and morph over time like software.
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
2/1/2014 | 12:48:40 PM
Re: WIld card
And then there are standards created by Reference Designs, say. Build this and it will work for sure, but that doesn't make it the only way to build the system. Will you still see huge divergence for cost or performance gains, and thus move away from the very standardized architecture you wanted to create?
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
2/1/2014 | 9:10:29 AM
Re: WIld card
Standards will always emerge, and hardware standards create lock-in in the absense of multiple competitors. Scale is also a challenge with hardware. Even if you had options to tinker with the parts, there are fixed costs in setting up manufacturing. Those components don't get cheaper without large production runs.
jgherbert
IW Pick
100%
0%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
1/31/2014 | 11:53:52 PM
Re: WIld card
@Lorna Garey: "It's never wise to underestimate how much engineers like standards."

 

Ooh, interesting. Standards or features? Cisco for example has for years made a habit of taking a standard and enhancing it for (as they see it) a better end result for their users. The standards often catch up later. Is there a danger that the same could end up happening here?

 
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
1/31/2014 | 4:30:21 PM
Re: WIld card
It's never wise to underestimate how much engineers like standards.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
1/31/2014 | 3:54:38 PM
The download factor
Charlie is right, the ease with which students can donwload code and tinker with Linux is another ballgame compared to designing data center hardware.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.