Comments
Microsoft's Windows Strategy Gets Muddy
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
zanzibar27
50%
50%
zanzibar27,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 3:33:21 PM
I find this disconcerting
Microsoft Windows "strategy" GETS muddy?  It been for some time now.  Maybe this article is mistitled a bit as it seems to talk about Windows phone and Windows apps.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/13/2014 | 4:22:04 PM
Re: I find this disconcerting
Yes, perhaps muddier would have been more appropriate

But to clarify your point about Windows apps and Windows phone apps: The article discusses both of them because the Windows strategies described in recent leaks pertain equally to both platforms.
  • One report indicates developers will soon be able to write an app once (or close to it), and then deploy it throughout the Windows ecosystem-- phones, tablets, PCs, whatever.
  • Likewise, the Windows Phone and Windows app stores will allegedly merge. Though this development showed up again this week, it is a long-running rumor, and it makes sense; in terms of most apps, it's arbitrary to distinguish phablets from small tablets. Plus, combining app stores automatically enriches the variety of titles available to users of both platforms. User should also be able to find apps more easily than ever. It wouldn't exactly bring the Live Tile ecosystem up to par with iOS and Android, but it would be a step in that direction.
  • The Android report also applies to both Windows Phones and Windows 8 devices (though this is presumably of most interest to tablet users).

In a way, in other words, Microsoft's "Windows" strategy seems to be evolving to encompass phones, tablets and PCs. Microsoft's strategy will still vary in certain ways across form factors, so there will be a time to talk about Microsoft's PC strategy as distinct from its tablet strategy, and so on. But in terms of future app development, the company (at least if these reports are accurate) is streamlining the entire ecosystem.
FreePropertyAlert
50%
50%
FreePropertyAlert,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2014 | 5:01:04 PM
Focus schmocus
The notion of focusing development on ANY particular platform is really misguided.  Using a tool like Xamarin you can pretty easily write for all platforms in .Net.  Slightly different looks for each platform, but the same business logic.  Even Microsoft is doing this - deploy ALL platforms at the same time with essentially the same codebase.
melgross
100%
0%
melgross,
User Rank: Ninja
2/13/2014 | 8:22:57 PM
Re: I find this disconcerting
In theory. This sounds good, but then, so did Win 8. Unless Microsoft tags apps that are appropriate for each device, there will be serious problems. I can see people buying apps for their phone that won't run properly on them, and visa versa. Developers will need not only to build in proper support for a device, but for all devices. So e apps are just meant for phones, and the GUI is purposes for that. Using that app on the desktop will be a problem, even if they manage to try to work it out. Apple has over a million apps, but almost half are purposed for the iPad. The idea that phone apps will be equally good on a tablet, much less a desktop is nuts! The same thing is true the other way around. Developers will either need to write three apps, or somehow write code that includes much for all three, that installs just what each needs. That's not impossible, as Apple has proven, several times, that it can be done. But will they do it either way? Without evidence of greater takeup of the devices, they may not want to bother. As for Android support in Win 8. Well, just wow! That will be a real mess. Blackberry has been trying that to no great success. I do t see how that would benefit Microsoft at all. Possibly, in the short term, they may get a small boost. But what's to stop people from moving to Android the next time? Likely, they will able to just download the apps again, and likely their data will still be theirs to keep. This is no good. Historically, when a company does this, creep begins to set in, and after a while, dissatisfied customers move to the other platform. Seriously, a main rule of business is to never give your customer an easy way to leave you. Giving Android will make leaving easier. Microsoft has !wYs been about lock-in. This will give their customers a way to lock Microsoft out. I can see people trying so e Android apps, and thinking that it isn't bad. Over time they will get more free, or cheap Android apps, until almost everything they do will be with those Android apps. What then? This just shows that Microsoft is becoming as desperate as Blackberry.
anon7359286176
50%
50%
anon7359286176,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/14/2014 | 1:10:32 AM
Re: I find this disconcerting
By making Nadella the CEO, MS sent a signal that the future of MS is in cloud based applications.

Successful transition to that future would first mean making MS-Office for Android. That way existing grip of MS-Office can be safeguarded for the future.

The other transition would be to offer Skype - essentially muddying Android's relations with Telcos.

Or, moving Skype first and seeing how it goes with Android and Telcos before moving MS-Office ;-)

Offering Visual Studio for Android may be a smash hit. However, there isn't much money to make there.

Everything else on the consumer side except Xbox will anyway die a natural death.
rradina
50%
50%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2014 | 8:33:25 AM
Android Apps on Windows Phone
I've read a number of interpretations of what "Android Apps on Windows Phone" means.  The most rational one is to enable Android application developers to use some kind of Microsoft cloud service that compiles their existing Android source code into a package suitable for installation on WinPhone 8 and subsequent submission to the Windows Store.

If this is what it means and the "packaged" Android app works well on WP8, seems like an excellent idea.  Both phones have the similar buttons so this shouldn't be trying to breed a cat with a fish.
SaneIT
50%
50%
SaneIT,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2014 | 8:58:47 AM
Re: I find this disconcerting
I run Bluestacks on my Windows tablet, but honestly I wish it didn't have to be that way.  I like the direction that Microsoft is going with bringing the same UI to every platform and mixing Android into the offerings seems like they are admitting defeat.  I would rather see them make development for the Win 8 platforms easier or more attractive.   I don't think Android is going away but that doesn't mean Microsoft can't be competitive. 
J_Brandt
50%
50%
J_Brandt,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2014 | 10:17:33 AM
HTML5 vs App Stores
I don't see how a combined store or app for the two OSes can work.  You end up making compromises that ultimately destroy the real power of the application (or you make them huge and bloated they neither fit nor run on the average device/machine).  From that perspective, pushing the web, HTML 5 and more makes more sense.  This is where we were headed before the success of  the iPhone and the App Store.  Maybe we can return there, but its doubtful.  Universally running applications are not in Apple, Google or Microsoft's "best" interest.
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2014 | 10:20:09 AM
Re: I find this disconcerting
I think Microsoft's problem is that it has too much money. It can afford to fight a long, losing battle on the mobile front by trying to make Windows a robust competitor for phones and tablets. But consumers have spoken, and they just aren't interested.
TerryB
50%
50%
TerryB,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2014 | 1:27:00 PM
Re: HTML5 vs App Stores
You are right on. The two big differences between phone and tablet/laptop is screen size and processing power. Over time, processing power will increase on phone but not size. Well, unless some kind of holographic projection technology becomes the norm anyway.

With HTML5 and using Model-View-Controller architecture, you can share a lot of code between these form factors. HTML5 is getting better at offline support and using native access (no browser to wrap the app). But you have to design your app much different for a small screen versus a larger screen, if you truly want the best experience in each world.

If these middleware tools get better at generating the proper Views needed for each form factor, maybe we'll get where we can write one code base. But we are not close to that yet. It's a facsinating area to watch, these small mobile screens have caused as much disruption in the development process since GUI replaced CUI. What you learned you have to learn all over again.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A UBM Tech Radio episode on the changing economics of Flash storage used in data tiering -- sponsored by Dell.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.