Comments
Google's Grand Fiber Plan: Cue The Eye Roll
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
RobPreston
0%
100%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
2/20/2014 | 4:48:34 PM
Re: Poor Article, no facts, no depth, no good!
Wow, quite the pile-on. And mostly from anonymous commenters. If you're all so much smarter and more informed and enlightened than Ms. Jander and so willing to take shots, why don't you state who you are.

Google made a big announcement four years ago that it was going to get into the broadband business, and four years later it hasn't rolled anything out. We need more facts, yes (and you're not going to find them on "social sites"), but four years is a helluva long time to "conduct trials," especially for a company so proud of moving in Internet time. 

As for the commenter who thinks Google is in a better position to provide telecom services than the telcos and cable providers, citing as evidence the fact that Google's stock is trading 80x higher than the stocks of the entrenched providers, let me just say that's Google's impressive stock price has nothing to do with its telecom posturing and everything to do with its search advertising profits and profit margins. 

I'll never underestimate Google. But the telecom business has confounded other smartest guys in the room before.

 
Laurianne
0%
100%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
2/20/2014 | 4:45:25 PM
Re: Poor Article, no facts, no depth, no good!
This piece is clearly labeled commentary -- so feel free to disagree with the writer's point of view. But she does raise interesting facts and cautions regarding Kansas and Provo that will be new to some of our readers. Google's speed on this effort is also debatable --  feel free to say you think Google is moving plenty fast. The author brought relevant facts to light and put them in context, then added her skepticism as a longtime watcher of the Google plans. Let's discuss your opinions, pros and cons here, of the Google plans, but let's not pretend people don't want opinion, clearly labeled as opinion, online. Commentary is a mainstay of our content mix here at InformationWeek and that's not going to change.
sethkroll
100%
0%
sethkroll,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:37:23 PM
Re: Interesting perspective
That's funny, I only registered for an account to say how terrible this post is, particularly after the first commentor tried to validate the article.
buckeyecal
100%
0%
buckeyecal,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:21:54 PM
Re: Interesting perspective
What perspective?  They have trialed the deployment and are now looking to do a roll-out?  Duh.  This is prudent business practice.  There is no valid content to this article and in turn no perspective in my opinion.
buckeyecal
100%
0%
buckeyecal,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:19:36 PM
Poor Article, no facts, no depth, no good!
It is obvious this author is just writing to seek headlines.  She has no clue on the industry, why Google would do trials, the costs/benefits of the industry, etc.  This level of "journalism" is the reason that many readers are bypassing traditional informational brands and using social sites to get their news.  The writers have no clue but to be cynical.  
Buck Bagok
100%
0%
Buck Bagok,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:18:48 PM
fastlane
Ms. Jander's glass is profoundly half empty. An entity as large and complicated as Google evolves on much more gradual timescale than, say, Richard Lenski's e.coli, so it may seem slow to some. They're smart and careful (Google, not the bacteria). 
anon7389186690
100%
0%
anon7389186690,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:14:23 PM
Re: Interesting perspective
There is no perspective here. There is a statement of cynicism, a couple of examples that demonstrate no basis for that cynicism, and a stuttering fade to black with no point made whatsoever. And you people get paid for this drivel?
BadArticle_Yup
100%
0%
BadArticle_Yup,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 4:01:06 PM
Re: Interesting perspective
I registered for an account just to say how much I agree with sethkroll.  This article is a worthless written whining of a biased author and it's best part was Seth's comment.

+1 for InformationWeak

 
sethkroll
100%
0%
sethkroll,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/20/2014 | 3:52:04 PM
Re: Interesting perspective
What perspective. She simply commented that maybe Google will follow through on a grand plan, or maybe they will not. A unique or even usful perspective would dig a little deeper as to why she rolls her eyes at Google's notion of bringing internet services to more US cities. She does not even suggest any evidence that they have made any grand prolamations before that thery have failed to follow through on. This post deserves to be hosted on Information Weak.
Laurianne
0%
100%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
2/20/2014 | 3:32:16 PM
Interesting perspective
Mary brings perpspective to this Google news that many mainstream news outlets missed. Do you share her attitude, readers?
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.