Comments
Patent Wars: No Simple Answers
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
3/19/2014 | 2:04:48 AM
Re: And another thing -- promiscuous software patents
I don't think that anyone can own math, but one should be able to own pathways you devise using that math. You can't patent the laws of aeodynamics, but you can patent an airplane based on them. And, what difference should there be in devising a physical machine from devising the same machine that only exists as interconnected matematical functions?
melgross
50%
50%
melgross,
User Rank: Ninja
3/18/2014 | 6:21:58 PM
Re: And another thing -- promiscuous software patents
You can't patent mathematical functions. But you can patent a program that uses those functions within the software. That's entirely proper. But UI innovations? They should be copyrighted instead. That's actually better for the software developer. It's a stronger bond than a patent, and lasts effectively forever. My belief on software patents is that they should exist. It's important as, whether it's an individual or a major company, they should have control over their own work. But, I do believe that for software, 20 years is too long. As it can be easier to benefit from a software patent over a short time, than for an electronic or particularly a mechanical invention, the patent should be for a shorter time. I think 10 years would be much better. It wouldn't end contention, but would force patent owners to attempt to use it earlier, and for others, it would make the wait less onerous.
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
3/18/2014 | 6:12:48 PM
Re: And another thing -- promiscuous software patents
I second Charlie's motion: Software patents should be granted, and their inventors rewarded, only if their inventions build legitimately on top of, without absorbing, the basic underlying math.

 
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/18/2014 | 1:12:45 PM
And another thing -- promiscuous software patents
Another issue that's hard to address is setting a higher bar for when software patents are issued. In the physical world, it's easier to decide if a machine or mechanical function or chemical reaction is new and innovative. In the world of software function and algorithms, the courts should set a stricter standard that no one owns the math, basic algorithms, user interface functions or programming procedures of computing software. They originate from many prior art contributors and should be part of the public trust, available to all. To profit from them, you need to innovate and design on top of them, not own the math.


Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 14, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.