Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
12/21/2011
01:39 PM
Maribel Lopez
Maribel Lopez
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Mobile Digital Divide: Personal Apps Vs. Work Apps

3 questions IT must answer to provide a better mobile experience for employees.

Today, consumers can do almost anything on a mobile device, from banking to taking a sample driver's license test. Many businesses have jumped through hoops to provide customers with phenomenal native Apple and Android smartphone and tablet apps experiences.

And yet, most employees are stuck in a mobile app time warp, limited to doing only email and calendars on their smartphones. Consumer apps have beautiful interfaces that utilize touch and deliver data in one or two clicks. Employee-facing apps have tiny fonts, ugly interfaces, and endless menus that require minutes of navigating to get data. In fact, an employee may need to access several applications before he or she has enough data to make a business decision.

Why? It's easy to blame security and compliance issues for holding companies back. But it's not the only reason we're seeing a digital divide between well-served consumers and neglected employees. There are at least three issues a company wrestles with as it looks to offer business apps to employees.

First, what should the company mobilize? Companies have dozens, if not hundreds, of apps, many of them custom built. IT already is wondering if it should kill some of those applications outright, consolidate them, or replace them with cloud-based software services. They don't want to spend money mobilizing a legacy app that they end up replacing. Also, the company needs to mobilize a whole process, not just an app. Mobilizing one app may allow an employee to complete only a portion of a process--finalizing a sale, for example, is often composed of transactions from multiple apps, such as CRM, inventory, and purchasing.

[ Keep on top of changes in the mobile industry. Read 5 Biggest Mobile Stories Of 2011. ]

Second, how should I mobilize these apps? Does IT build apps that are native to the device, embrace an HTML5 mobile Web experience, or build a hybrid of native and Web? If it selects native app development, it also has to choose which mobile operating system platforms. Does it support Apple iOS, Google Android, RIM Blackberry, and Microsoft Windows Phone? What companies are learning is that there's no single software development model that works for every mobile scenario. Most businesses will use a mix of native, hybrid, and mobile Web. The decision will depend on the depth of functionality the app requires.

Third, what are the top priorities for mobile development? In selecting processes to mobilize, a business must decide what parts of which apps will be available on a mobile device, and which apps will be done first. Just taking an app that was created for desktop use and making it accessible on a mobile device won't work. IT must understand what functions of the app should be accessible on a mobile device, and how much they need to be revised for mobile work. These are complex questions that can stall IT efforts.

To get over these humps, a successful mobile strategy requires IT to work with each business unit to define which processes will deliver the greatest business benefit. IT should select a short list of processes and mobilize these to prove the business case. Get a quick win and move on from there.

IT also needs to help the company rethink what an app is. Many businesses try to replicate the entire desktop app for a mobile device. For an initial mobile rollout, it is perfectly acceptable to pick one or two functions of the application and deliver those well. However, the days of a one-year (or more) application development cycle are over. Don't let "feature creep" get in the way delivering those one or two functions quickly. And once the mobile app is live, be prepared to listen to employees, hear what's missing, and quickly add new features.

Of course there are other issues to resolve such as the security issues of employee-owned devices, management of mobile devices and applications, and the cost. But until the basic questions of what and how to mobilize are resolved, there will continue to be too big a digital divide between what a person can achieve with consumer apps versus what they can achieve with an enterprise mobile app.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BjornHildahl
50%
50%
BjornHildahl,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/9/2012 | 6:18:26 PM
re: Mobile Digital Divide: Personal Apps Vs. Work Apps
The points in your article are an accurate reflection of the complexities of the mobile landscape and subsequent difficulties organizations face when looking to implement business-to-employee (B2E) mobile solutions. In my opinion, the how question is the most important issue to address. With over 9,000 devices on the market today, and more employees bringing their own devices to work, what is the best way for organizations to seamlessly generate applications that provide superior user interface and experience? In order to eliminate the worry, I suggest application developers use a platform that enables them to create optimized applications for any device, operating system or browser using a single code base. This means that all employees are served with an optimized application regardless of whether they have an Apple, Blackberry or Android device. It also allows the organization to focus on its business while ensuring faster time to market and lower development costs.

-Sri Ramanathan
CHDFW
50%
50%
CHDFW,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/3/2012 | 5:33:43 PM
re: Mobile Digital Divide: Personal Apps Vs. Work Apps
Interesting Article...Within my organization we look at this on a regular basis and we tend to lump what to mobilize into 2 Categories what is canned and what is custom/proprietary.

As it relates to Canned, we tend to look to the vendor for a portal or tool, whats interesting now is this is an criteria point as we evaluate applications. What tends to happened is the org is needing from a user is a decision typically in a workflow, like purchasing and the user is wanting data, emails, calendar, KPI and there tends to some good solutions available, with limited security at this point.

For Custom/proprietary I believe this article does reflect accurately the decisions that need to be weighted.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government, May 2014
NIST's cyber-security framework gives critical-infrastructure operators a new tool to assess readiness. But will operators put this voluntary framework to work?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.