We could be seeing an iPhone Nano in the future if the new patent application by Apple is anything to go by. Much of the appeal of the current iPhone is the rich functionality that the large screen allows. Could Apple repeat that success with a phone with a much smaller screen?
We could be seeing an iPhone Nano in the future if the new patent application by Apple is anything to go by. Much of the appeal of the current iPhone is the rich functionality that the large screen allows. Could Apple repeat that success with a phone with a much smaller screen?MacNN has uncovered the patent application from Apple entitled "Embedded die system and method" complete with some sketches of some core components, though nothing of what a finished phone might look like.
The patent states "...it may be desirable to miniaturize electronic devices. More particularly, it may be advantageous to miniaturize electronic devices without sacrificing functionality."
I wonder though how you could have a materially smaller screen and still retain the functionality of the current iPhone. I would think at a minimum you'd need some sort of slide-out keyboard. Shrinking the existing virtual QWERTY keyboard on the iPhone too much would seem to seriously hamper its functionality.
Battery life shouldn't be a big deal though. Yes, a smaller phone has a smaller battery, but it is also powering a smaller screen.
Apple does need to move on a new form factor. The current iPhone is virtually identical to the iPhone first introduced in 2007, and the single largest complaint about the form factor is a lack of a physical keyboard. The iPhone is beautiful device, but it is nice to see concrete evidence that Apple is thinking about different designs.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?