ITC grants Samsung's request to block the import of older iPhones and iPads due to patent infringement.
5 Apple iPad 5 Wishes
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Apple was dealt a significant blow in its ongoing patent battle with Samsung on Tuesday. The U.S. International Trade Commission upheld a ruling that found Apple guilty of infringing on a patent owned by Samsung. The result? Apple may not be allowed to import some older iPhones and iPads into the U.S.
The patent covers standard essential 3G technology. Because it is labeled as such, Samsung will have to license the patent for fair and reasonable terms. It requested the ban, claiming financial harm due to Apple's sales of the infringing devices.
The ban affects the AT&T versions of iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4, as well as the AT&T 3G versions of the original iPad and iPad 2. Though a ban is a tough hurdle for Apple to surmount, the good news is that the company's newest devices aren't affected. The iPad Mini, iPad 3rd and 4th generation, as well as the iPhone 4S and iPhone 5 are all in the clear.
Apple was unhappy with the ruling.
"We are disappointed that the Commission has overturned an earlier ruling and we plan to appeal," said Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet. "Today's decision has no [immediate] impact on the availability of Apple products in the United States. Samsung is using a strategy which has been rejected by courts and regulators around the world. They've admitted that it's against the interests of consumers in Europe and elsewhere, yet here in the United States Samsung continues to try to block the sale of Apple products by using patents they agreed to license to anyone for a reasonable fee."
The U.S. Department of Justice has cautioned courts, including the ITC, against the use of product bans. It believes such bans are harmful to consumers and not in the best interest of competition. The ITC appears to have forgotten the Justice Department's warning in this case. The ban can only be overturned by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or the White House.
At least one analyst believes Apple will survive the ban mostly unscathed. Perennial Apple bull Gene Munster pointed out that the iPhone 4 is the only one of the iPhones still available for sale in the U.S. It is offered for free by some carriers and amounted to less than 8% of Apple's revenue over the last two quarters.
"The actual impact will likely be less than 1% [on its revenue] given AT&T customers that would not have a chance to purchase an iPhone 4 could buy an iPhone 4S or 5 instead," said Munster. "Given the iPhone 4 will likely be retired at the end of September, there should not be an impact after the September 2013 quarter."
Samsung is, understandably, elated about the ITC's ruling.
"We believe the ITC's Final Determination has confirmed Apple's history of free-riding on Samsung's technological innovations," said Samsung in a statement. "Our decades of research and development in mobile technologies will continue, and we will continue to offer innovative products to consumers in the United States."
It's not clear if or when the ban will go into effect. Apple has yet to officially file its appeal of the ITC's decision.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?