Cisco Preps Server-Switch As HP Prepares Flank Attack
Code-named California, Cisco's server is expected to meld Cisco's Nexus 5000 switch, Intel's Nehalem processors, and virtualization management with help from VMware.
Cisco seems poised to enter the data center server market.
The networking leader has developed a blade server chassis that combines an Intel-based server, a top-of-rack switch, and virtualization management capabilities in an integrated system, according to sources confirming reports elsewhere last week.
At the same time, Hewlett-Packard is considering its own new avenue of assault against Cisco, as it prepares to announce a combined server-switch of its own.
Cisco isn't commenting specifically, but the concept of an integrated server-switch is consistent with its recently announced "unified computing" strategy, which sees a coming together of network, computing, and virtualization platforms. "What you get with that is simplification through a pre-designed virtualization architecture, not buying discrete components and having to weld them together in your shop, but an architecture that's designed around the concept of the virtual machine," Doug Gourlay, Cisco's senior director of data center marketing and product management, said in a video he posted online earlier this month.
Cisco's system, code-named California, likely will be introduced in the spring, according to the sources. It will meld Cisco's Nexus 5000 switch that converges storage and data network traffic, blade servers that employ Intel Nehalem processors, and virtualization management with help from VMware. Cisco invested $150 million in VMware last year, and the companies tout a common vision for virtualization. Red Hat's Linux operating system will also be part of the system, according to a report from one financial analyst, though another source said California could be OS-agnostic.
Whatever the case, it's clear Cisco is trying to make the network more virtualization aware, and vice versa with technologies like its Nexus 1000V, which integrates with VMware's hypervisor to set and maintain network policy for virtual machines, and California is said to be purpose-built for data centers with virtualization in mind. "You definitely see Cisco moving up the stack," Cisco server access and virtualization marketing VP Jackie Ross said in an interview. "The network and the application are increasingly tied closely together." For example, unless virtualization management is stressed from the start, policies like quality of service and data protection can get lost in the virtual machine shuffle.
Hewlett-Packard, meanwhile, is preparing its own two-in-one system, one that combines a ProLiant server and ProCurve switch, sources say. It's expected to appear early in 2009. HP recently moved its ProCurve networking arm into its Technology Solutions Group to more closely align those businesses.
IT departments often buy servers, switches, and virtualization tools separately, and configuring them to work together is a nontrivial task. The forthcoming products from Cisco and HP would aim to simplify that work. Blade platforms aren't new, but most have multivendor hardware, few have the laser focus on virtualization like Cisco's California should, and even fewer are as comprehensive as what it seems Cisco will offer.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?
In this special, sponsored radio episode we’ll look at some terms around converged infrastructures and talk about how they’ve been applied in the past. Then we’ll turn to the present to see what’s changing.