Mobile
Commentary
11/13/2011
10:18 PM
Ed Hansberry
Ed Hansberry
Commentary
50%
50%

Did Greed Kill Flash For Mobile Devices?

Macromedia's fear of losing a revenue stream appears to be a key reason the development platform for phones and tablets died.

Adobe has been trying to get Flash Lite out of first gear for the last few years. Apple didn't help matters by blocking the software outright. Flash's original owner, Macromedia, had the opportunity to make Flash as common on phones years before the iPhone enter the market, and failed to do so because it may have meant lost revenue.

Much, if not most, of the blame for the demise of Flash on mobile devices has been laid at Apple's feet. The iPhone completely changed the mobile phone market in 2008 when the company launched the App Store. Smartphone platform creators had previously allowed anyone to write anything for their platforms, but not Apple. Steve Jobs believed in completely controlling the user experience and with iOS, he had an opportunity to do what couldn't be done for OS X. Every single app for the iPhone would meet a set of criteria and be officially approved by Apple.

Flash didn't meet those criteria, and so it was never allowed on the platform. In April of 2010, Jobs wrote his "Thoughts on Flash" manifesto, which in no uncertain terms said Flash would never be allowed on iOS. HTML 5 was on the horizon then and its success has put the final nail in the coffin of Flash for mobile devices.

However, long before the iPhone was released in 2007, Flash was alive and well on mobile phones. Not only was it available, it generated revenue for Macromedia. In early 2003, DoCoMo licensed Flash Lite for its iMode phones in Japan.

According to Michael Mace, Palm's former chief competition officer, when it came time to get Flash on other platforms in 2003 and 2004, Macromedia ran into a problem. Unlike DoCoMo, no one else wanted to pay. They expected the Flash viewer to be free. That was the original model--the viewer was free and the developer tools were the source of revenue. It worked great on the PC, so much so Adobe paid over $3 billion for Macromedia to get Flash.

Macromedia feared losing its revenue stream from the Japanese market so it declined to offer Flash Lite to other carriers around the world for free, at least for a few years. By the time it was free, it was too late. As Mace points out, users grew accustomed to not viewing Flash on their phones and howls of protests declined. HTML 5 came along and made Flash redundant.

Now the platform is being wound down for mobile devices. This is only the beginning too. Flash for the desktop will be the next to go.

I wonder how the mobile landscape would be look today had Macromedia chose to license the mobile player to manufactures at no cost in 2003?

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
EVVJSK
50%
50%
EVVJSK,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/15/2011 | 9:44:01 PM
re: Did Greed Kill Flash For Mobile Devices?
Big difference between Flash Lite and Flash. Case in point, I have a Nokia E71 which can run Flash Lite. Makes it decent for watching Youtube videos, but DOES NOT allow me to watch vides on Comedy Central, also does not allow me to listen to Major League Baseball (not even the Audio Only Stream which would be low bandwidth, or even XM Radio which would also be essentially audio only for low bandwidth). For these "REAL" applications, you need Adobe Flash (in most cases 9.x or above). Flash Lite just will not get the job done. It would seem that either Flash Lite couldn't do the authentication that was required or Adobe didn't work with developers and companies to educate them on the value of programming to the older Flash Lite functionality so these applications would run on a wider variety of mobile platforms.
jrapoza
50%
50%
jrapoza,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/15/2011 | 6:28:11 PM
re: Did Greed Kill Flash For Mobile Devices?
I agree with everything here. Flash was badly mismanaged on the mobile side and Flash will die on the desktop (though that will take a few years).

Jim Rapoza is an InformationWeek Contributing Editor
InformationWeek Elite 100
InformationWeek Elite 100
Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 7, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.