A piece in this week's Economist draws comparisons between cars and mobile phones, urging you to "look in your driveway" to understand how phones will develop.
A piece in this week's Economist draws comparisons between cars and mobile phones, urging you to "look in your driveway" to understand how phones will develop.It's a great take. We've said that what we now call the smartphone will soon enough be what everyone just considers a phone. The Economist makes a similar point, noting that just as automatic locks and electric windows were once flashy, GPS, mobile television, and massive storage space will soon be standard. But it adds one nice dose of skepticism: whether we'll use all these features. It concludes the "industry's current mania for converged devices is misguided." Just as there's a place for the SUV and the sports car, often in the same garage, there will be work phones and weekend phones.
It leaves one important point of comparison to cars out: those who don't have them. In the U.S. in particular, lack of a car is a distinct economic disadvantage, making it far more difficult to get to where the jobs are. Mobile computing -- that's what we're talking here, not just chit-chat -- will soon be economically vital as well.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?