Everyone at Microsoft that is. It looks like all 90,000 employees of Microsoft will be getting a new phone with Windows Phone 7 on it. If nothing else, it makes it instantly more successful than the Kin, perhaps ten times as successful.
Everyone at Microsoft that is. It looks like all 90,000 employees of Microsoft will be getting a new phone with Windows Phone 7 on it. If nothing else, it makes it instantly more successful than the Kin, perhaps ten times as successful.Mary Jo Foley retweeted the news from a Microsoft employee. As Ms. Foley puts it, only thirty million devices to go.
By seeding the employees with the devices, Microsoft should generate some buzz and recommendations by word of mouth, though it will be heavily concentrated in the Seattle area. The question is, will those with iPhone or Android willingly give up their current phone for the new one or will devices find their way onto eBay?
The Windows Phone team will really be on the hot seat once all of their coworkers have one, which may be the point. I think that if they are surrounded by users of their device, comments, both good and bad, will help correct things that are wrong faster than they otherwise would.
A few years ago Microsoft tried to get employees to give up their iPods in favor of the Zune. Results there were less than stellar. The key difference with the new program though is the phones are free. Microsoft wasn't passing out free Zunes, though in hindsight, I bet they wish they had to spur interest in the platform.
Do you think this will make a material difference in marketing the device, or could the money, probably round $9 million dollars or more, be better spent promoting the platform?
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?