Google Secrets Revealed: Paid Apple $1B, Android Raked In $31B - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Mobile
News
1/22/2016
03:52 PM
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Threat Intelligence Overload?
Aug 23, 2017
A wide range of threat intelligence feeds and services have cropped up keep IT organizations up to ...Read More>>

Google Secrets Revealed: Paid Apple $1B, Android Raked In $31B

Google is seeking to seal court transcripts in its Java patent and copyright infringement case with Oracle after an Oracle attorney disclosed Android generated $31 billion in revenue. Also disclosed, Google paid a hefty sum to Apple to keep the Google search bar on the iPhone.

Best Free iPhone, Android Apps: Our Top 10
Best Free iPhone, Android Apps: Our Top 10
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

In the latest twist in its long-standing Java patent and copyright legal battle with Oracle, Google is asking the court to seal transcripts in which an Oracle attorney disclosed that its Android software has generated $31 billion in revenue.

Oracle attorney Annette Hurst not only reportedly disclosed the $31 billion revenue figure during a Jan. 14 hearing in the case, but also revealed that Android generated $22 billion in profits, according to a Bloomberg report

(Image: JasminSeidel/iStockphoto)

(Image: JasminSeidel/iStockphoto)

Google, which has never publicly released Android revenue and profit figures, is alarmed that such information slipped out. It filed a motion Wednesday in the US District Court of Northern California to keep the Jan. 14 hearing transcripts sealed. A section of the court request filed by Edward Bayley, outside counsel for Google, states:

During the January 14, 2016 discovery hearing on Oracle's Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 1404) counsel for Oracle disclosed information regarding Google's sensitive, non-public revenues and profits associated with Android. January 14, 2016 Tr. at 4:10-13, 6:19-20. This information was derived from internal Google financial documents that Google has designated as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" under the Protective Order that governs this case.  Dkt. No. 66. Oracle did not provide any advance notice to Google that it intended to disclose this highly confidential information at the hearing.

Google does not publicly allocate revenues or profits to Android separate and apart from Google's general business. Google considers that non-public financial data to be highly sensitive, and public disclosure of the information described herein could have significant negative effects on Google's business.

Android revenue and profits weren't the only thing that slipped out at the hearing. Oracle's attorney also reportedly disclosed that Apple received $1 billion from Google to keep the Internet giant's search bar on the iPhone, according to Bloomberg.

Google's attorney also noted the damage that may come from that disclosure and suggested that Apple may also weigh in on seeking to seal any financial information that is included in the hearing transcripts:

During the January 14, 2016 discovery hearing, Oracle's counsel also disclosed confidential financial terms of an agreement between Google and non-party Apple Inc. January 14, 2016 Tr. at 29:24-25. This information was derived from deposition testimony that Google has designated as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" under the Protective Order that governs this case. Dkt. No. 66. Oracle did not provide any advance notice to Google that it intended to disclose this highly confidential information at the hearing.

Public disclosure of the Apple-related financial information would severely and adversely impact Google's ability to negotiate, inter alia, similar terms with other third parties in connection with similar agreements now or in the future. In addition to being highly confidential to Google, this information is also subject to a non-disclosure agreement with Apple and constitutes Apple’s confidential information. I understand that Apple may submit a declaration setting forth the reasons why this financial information is highly confidential to Apple, and why public dissemination of this financial information would harm Apple.

Although Google's Jan. 20 request to seal the hearing transcripts was available on the electronic filings site for the US District Court of Northern California, Bloomberg noted that an electronic version of the hearing transcript had disappeared from the site at approximately 3 p.m. PST on the day Google made the request, even though there was no indication that the court had ordered such action be taken.

[Read Google Goes With OpenJDK for Android.]

Meanwhile, Oracle's lawsuit against Google for allegedly violating its Java patents and copyrights when it developed Android may still be far from a final resolution. In July, Oracle filed a motion with the court to update its lawsuit with information regarding Android's marketshare and dominance among operating systems, according to Reuters.

Over the summer, Oracle received a favorable court decision when the US Supreme Court sided with a federal appeals court's ruling that Oracle could seek licensing fees for some of the use of Java by other parties.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
1/28/2016 | 10:04:07 PM
Re: Raked in???
@SunitaT0: Google's "license" doesn't fetch them much. They have variable sources to profit from. One, they profit from sales, two, they profit from collecting usable data from the smartphones by selling the information to companies which use them to direct ads that display in your mobile.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
1/28/2016 | 10:00:45 PM
Re: Raked in???
@Brian: I for now like the Google Now, which although isn't as accurate as Siri or S-Voice as it still cannot make tax calculations based on voice input. However as an overall search/digital assistant I love the Google Now because it is snappy and no nonsense.
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2016 | 5:59:40 PM
Re: Raked in???
@Sunita that is a great point. Search is long overdue for a new and better version, almost all of the leading technology firms have recognized that search has to be redefined and have created Personal Digital Assistants for instance, Google Now, Cortana and Siri, etc.

Users that are confident with technology have started to utilize these tools with success. However, the technology is still in its early days -- users will not utilize these tools in large numbers until the technology reaches relative maturity.
SunitaT0
50%
50%
SunitaT0,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2016 | 2:38:49 PM
Re: Raked in???
@steve: Yes I agree. But Google doesn't charge for Android on Mobiles. It only charges for the license that it would sell to the mobile manufacturers and yeilds a percentage based on their sales. The nexus devices, although, are a different story altogether.
SunitaT0
50%
50%
SunitaT0,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2016 | 2:36:49 PM
Re: Raked in???
I really don't see why Google shouldn't put more effort into making the Android search a more of a go-to search thing. On Android we use Google Now, and it is my go to search option before I even consider typing what I want to search in the googledotcom window.
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
1/24/2016 | 7:49:11 PM
Re: Raked in???
It would be interesting to see a breakdown of Android earning $31 billion.

Android-mobile search is not a big revenue generator compared to Google's overall revenue. According to a 2014 analysis by Goldman Sachs, Google's revenue for mobile search was $11.8 billion in 2014 and 75% of the revenue was from iOS devices with the remaining 25% from Android devices.

Google does not charge phone manufacturers for installing Android onto a device -- no revenue. The ad network in the Play Store might be a large source. I wonder if there are any other possible revenue streams that could be used to monetize Android.
stevew928
50%
50%
stevew928,
User Rank: Ninja
1/23/2016 | 1:40:58 PM
Raked in???
I'm not sure if 'raked in' would be the right phrase to describe Android revenue and profits. I'm sure Google was a bit embarassed by that number leaking out, as that figure was ALL-TIME for Android, which is still less than LAST-QUARTERS results for Apple's iPhone sales.

The $1B though, is a good deal for both parties. Google gets all that high-end search traffic for only $1B, and Apple uses, by far, the best search engine technology. Win-win.
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll