The approach is recognition that companies using SSDs in the data center are also likely to use traditional drives, which are considerably less expensive.
IBM on Thursday said it has added the option of using solid-state drives on its Power Systems servers.
Along with the hardware, IBM also offers software management tools for SSDs. On servers using IBM Power6 processors, the company is offering Data Balancer, software that allows a system administrator to move frequently accessed data to SSDs to provide quicker access. Other data is moved to conventional hard disk drives.
The two-pronged approach is recognition that companies using SSDs in the data center are also likely to use traditional drives, which are considerably less expensive. The benefit of using SSDs, besides less power consumption and a smaller footprint, is speed. SSDs, which use Flash memory for storage, conduct up to 20,000 data transfers per second, compared with 200 data transfers per second on a hard drive.
Spending a lot more for that level of performance is justified in certain applications, such as airline reservations, ticketing, or stock-trading systems that depend on fast online transaction processing to service customers.
In offering SSDs with Power Systems, IBM expands the use of the technology beyond System x servers and System Storage DS8000 devices. The Power Systems portfolio includes blade servers, database servers, and servers for running business applications and for high-performance computing environments.
In October, IBM introduced the "Express" brand to its midlevel Power Systems, which indicates that the hardware is faster to deploy than enterprise-level servers and contains a number of automated management features to simplify maintenance. The systems include storage and the WebSphere application server.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?