IBM's marketing campaigns have come a long way since the '80s. Anyone here get a teary-eyed nostalgic feeling thinking about the old Charlie Chaplin series? No? Me neither.
IBM's marketing campaigns have come a long way since the '80s. Anyone here get a teary-eyed nostalgic feeling thinking about the old Charlie Chaplin series? No? Me neither.Fast forward to the frustrations of 2007. Big Blue's latest stunt is a series of homemade videos featuring a small cluster of IT guys seeking revenge on back-end servers that failed them in some way.
Middle of the desert. A hog-tied white box. Witty dialogue ensues.
"Hey, man. Remember that server crash that happened over Christmas?"
"That's the one where you had to come in..."
"Oh, is that the ONE?"
Cut to a shot where the server is slung over a tree branch and mercilessly smacked till it breaks open, revealing... candy.
Gee, Einstein, if your server had candy inside of it, no wonder it died on you.
IBM created four snippets for the series. And if you haven't guessed, IBM is trying to sell its System i servers. Other clips include rigging up a server with skateboard wheels and riding it like a luge down a hill. A third involves Diet Coke and Mentos with pretty lame results. Also, don't worry if you miss the guy dressed up like King Kong and tipping over servers made to look like downtown. It's passable.
Gratuitous violence and servers, though -- I like that. That's something I think everyone can relate to even if they have IBM hardware and software.
Of course, my favorite IBM marketing stunt was its Peace, Love, Linux campaign. The company hired kids and street taggers to spray paint Tux and the two other icons on some city sidewalks. A feat, I might add, that cost them more money to clean up than to launch.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?