Software giant’s fastest-selling OS ever surpasses Vista in global PC ubiquity.
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Microsoft's Windows 7 Phone Revealed
Microsoft says it has sold 240 million Windows 7 licenses since releasing the operating system to retailers a year ago, making it the fastest-selling OS in the company's history.
Also, as of September, the successor to the much-maligned Windows Vista was running on 93% of new consumer PCs, Microsoft said Thursday. According to Web metrics firm Net Applications, Windows 7 accounted for 17.1% of the global OS market as of the end of September and had surpassed Vista in July.
In the six months after Windows 7 started appearing on store shelves, all of Microsoft's more than 18,000 computer-making partners were selling PCs with the new OS. That compared with 70% during the same period for Vista.
In general, Microsoft software has been getting higher marks from consumers. In 2007, the first full year Vista was available, the company's rating on the American Customer Satisfaction Index was a 70, which is less than the 75 rating for all other software makers. This year's, Microsoft's rating is 76, while other software makers as a group scored 77. (The ACSI scores on a 0-100 scale.)
Microsoft's bottom line has benefited from the success of Windows 7. In the fourth fiscal quarter ended June 30, Windows and Office, the company's two workhorses, drove a 48% increase in profit year over year and a 22% jump in revenue.
At the time, the company benefited from businesses increasing spending to replace older computers that companies had held onto during last year's recession. Microsoft's Windows and Windows Live Division reported a 44% jump in revenue year to year, to $4.6 billion, driven mostly by Windows 7 sales.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?