Mobile // Mobile Business
News
5/15/2014
04:06 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

FCC 'Open' Internet May Mean 'Paid'

Federal Communications Commission votes to consider broadband rules that could allow data fast lanes. Public invited to comment.

Google I/O 2014: 8 Things To Watch
Google I/O 2014: 8 Things To Watch
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted 3-to-2 to open a controversial Internet regulation proposal to public comment, beginning a process that might normalize paid prioritization of Internet traffic.

The proposal, put forth by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, represents an attempt to offer rules for broadband service providers that fit within existing communications laws. The agency's 2010 rules were rejected earlier this year in a legal challenge by Verizon, leaving the agency's ability to regulate Internet service providers up in the air.

As a result of the vote, the agency will accept input from the public about its proposal for the next four months.

[When government and healthcare clash: Read How My Cousin, President George W. Bush, Almost Killed Athenahealth.]

The FCC characterizes its Open Internet proposal as an attempt to determine the right policy to ensure that the Internet remains "open." But the proposal's contemplation of paid prioritization for network data traffic -- referred to as fast lanes for data -- has alarmed Internet companies and cyber liberties advocates who see paid prioritization as a threat to small Internet companies and as fundamentally anti-democratic.

The risk is that paid prioritization will turn the Internet into a protection racket. Without some regulatory restraint, large network providers such as Comcast might decide to demand extra fees from content delivery services like Netflix -- particularly from companies that compete in some way -- to ensure that their streaming video isn't degraded.  

Attempting to defuse the controversy surrounding the rule revision, Wheeler said that nothing in this Open Internet proposal authorizes paid prioritization. But then nothing in the proposal definitively rules it out.

Image: AOL
Image: AOL

Reaction to the proposal promises a summer of intense lobbying and disagreement. Victoria Kaplan, lead campaign director for MoveOn.org Political Action, in a statement slammed the FCC's move to consider Wheeler's proposal, which, she said, "could destroy the Internet as we know it."

George Foote, a partner at the International law firm Dorsey & Whitney who has worked with the FCC, offered a statement to the contrary, dismissing such claims. "The FCC's proposed open internet order does not threaten the

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
5/15/2014 | 8:49:43 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
If less than 10 internet companies are currently accounting for 80% of internet's traffic, then shouldn't the internet to open to monetization, because I feel that these 10 or so companies do not represent 80% of the value that the internet creates. Opening it up to monetization should (at least in theory) make them pay for 80% of the internet.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
5/15/2014 | 5:51:30 PM
Re: "Open Internet"??
There's a lot of that going around. Mozilla, which says its mission is to defend the "open Internet," has just agreed to support DRM in Firefox. I would humbly suggest that anyone using the word "open" be required to write it thus: "open(*)"
GlenW218
50%
50%
GlenW218,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 5:08:40 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
I like Mozilla Proposal, it is what I'm been arguing for weeks.  A lot of people disagree with me.  It makes sense when less than 10 internet companies make up more than 80% of the internet traffic.
anon1471712903
100%
0%
anon1471712903,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 4:59:24 PM
"Open Internet"??
Don't you just love how government names things?  That way they can get all the support they need from lazy thinkers who just read the title.  "Open Internet?   Oh sure, I'm for that.   Everybody should be for an open internet."

 

I can assure you that when you appoint a cable lobbiest head of the FCC that the end result will be anything *BUT* and open internet.
CMyers
50%
50%
CMyers,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2014 | 4:57:48 PM
Re: Mozilla's compromise
That would probably work, because traffic on the downstream-to-consumer side can be disguised with a VPN if it starts getting throttled.  If they're allowed to manipulate the upstream-to-network side, they will shut down any services that get popular enough to make a dent in the bandwidth, with tolls precisely calculated to make them uncompetitive.
Laurianne
100%
0%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
5/15/2014 | 4:26:17 PM
Mozilla's compromise
What do you think of Mozilla's proposal, readers? A smart step or not enough?
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
InformationWeek Elite 100
InformationWeek Elite 100
Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek - September 2, 2014
Avoiding audits and vendor fines isn't enough. Take control of licensing to exact deeper software discounts and match purchasing to actual employee needs.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Listen Now This InformationWeek
In in-depth look at InformationWeek's top stories for the preceding week.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.