Mobile // Mobile Devices
Commentary
12/13/2011
09:39 PM
Ed Hansberry
Ed Hansberry
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NTSB Cellphone Ban Highlights Mishmash Of State Rules

While many states have laws covering driver texting and mobile phone use, it's a patchwork of rules, with different levels of enforcement.

Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made a recommendation to ban the use of cellphones and messaging devices by drivers. This doesn't just mean you cannot hold a phone to your head. The proposed ban includes hands-free devices. The only phone system allowed would be a device installed in the vehicle. Passengers would be unaffected.

Many states have laws prohibiting texting and handheld devices, but it is a patchwork of laws with different levels of enforcement. According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, only nine states plus Washington D.C. require drivers to use hands-free devices. Some states, like Hawaii, have no ban, but every county has a distracted driving ordinance. While that purports to do the same thing, the enforcement is a bit more subjective.

Illinois bans hand-held devices when driving through school zones or construction zones, but Main Street is fair game. South Carolina, Texas, Utah, New Hampshire, and other states have their own twist on distracted driving and cellphone use. You can see it quickly gets tough to figure out what the law is in a given jurisdiction.

Making the issue even worse is another layer on top of that aimed at novice drivers, which are those who are under 18, have a permit, are in their first year of driving, or have a combination of two or more of those conditions.

Texting laws have their own maze of rules and regulations. Quick--what is the law in your state for texting and handheld devices? Check out the chart to see if you are correct.

The issue here is being distracted while moving down the road at 50 mph. Traveling at that speed you are covering just over 73 feet per second. A five-second distraction is 367 feet--more than a football field. That's about how long it took you to read this sentence, which would easily fit in a text message. If you had to unlock your phone to read the message and you reply with a quick "ok," the amount of attention being diverted away from driving goes up exponentially. At 70 mph on the interstate, you cover over 500 feet in the same time. A lot can happen in that distance.

The NTSB has no actual authority to implement such a ban. It is only an advisory board. The federal government, likewise, has limited authority over the states. However, it carries a big stick in the way of funding. To get uniform laws passed in all 50 states, the federal government just has to withhold federal highway funding. This is how a national 55 mph speed limit was enacted in the 1970s.

Note that while the NTSB has no actual authority, its recommendations carry a lot of weight. Most of its recommendations are carried out. Highway laws passed due to NTSB recommendations include age 21 drinking laws, high-mount brake lights, and the commercial drivers' license. Expect the cellphone ban proposal to get some traction quickly.

It looks like we may lose some of the productivity gained in the past 10 years from people doing work behind the wheel. Somehow though, the world managed to work in the decades before widespread cellphone usage. It is a question of what is more important, a human life or a closing a deal at high speed rather than pulling into a Starbucks to hammer out the final details.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
YMOM100
50%
50%
YMOM100,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/16/2011 | 7:42:46 PM
re: NTSB Cellphone Ban Highlights Mishmash Of State Rules
The radio doesn't care when you stop listening and the passenger will likely be aware of the situation so that a non-reply is understood. The person on the other phone doesn't know that.
Besides that, talking isn't the issue. What goes these days as 'hands-free' is nothing more than a bluetooth ear piece, but people still dial by hand or press the receive button to accept the call. Hands-free would require something with voice control and many cell phones don't have that.
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2011 | 10:05:30 PM
re: NTSB Cellphone Ban Highlights Mishmash Of State Rules
Closing a deal at high speed is more important. :) Honestly though, I think a ban on hands-free is definitely overkill...should we also ban radios? Talking with your wife/girlfriend while on the road? And if the issue is cell phones then what difference does it make if you have a phone system built into the car?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
EVVJSK
50%
50%
EVVJSK,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2011 | 8:51:27 PM
re: NTSB Cellphone Ban Highlights Mishmash Of State Rules
Be careful agreeing to anything that might be a good idea. The Global CIO folks might just take exception to something and shun you into submission ;-)
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.