10 Historic Tech Memos & Rants - InformationWeek
Mobile // Mobile Devices
08:06 AM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Connect Directly
Faster, More Effective Response With Threat Intelligence & Orchestration Playboo
Aug 31, 2017
Finding ways to increase speed, accuracy, and efficiency when responding to threats should be the ...Read More>>

10 Historic Tech Memos & Rants

From Ballmer to Jobs, tech leaders write memos, manifestos, and rants that shape how we all think about computing. These 10 provocative statements each have a place in tech history.

Technology tends to be associated with cold, mechanical precision. Nevertheless, the technology industry attracts a fair number of outspoken firebrands.

Perhaps the opinionated nature of noted technology leaders is a consequence of the personality traits required to press ahead in the face of naysayers, skeptics, and rivals. Whatever the reason, the tech industry has given rise to a plethora of indignant memos, manifestos, and rants rich with self-righteousness and personal conviction. They describe what's wrong with the world and how to set things right.

They tell us to think different(ly).

The following texts are 10 of the most meaningful, entertaining, astute, and provocative pieces to appear online in the past two decades.

[ From Amazon to Y2K, here are the stories behind some of the most pivotal developments in technology over the past quarter century. See InformationWeek's Most Important Cover Stories. ]

Steve Yegge, Google: Stevey's Google Platforms Rant
Google engineer Steve Yegge spent six years at Amazon, and in 2011 he used that experience to inform his indictment of what Google does wrong and Amazon does right. It's remarkable in its candor. And it's a testament to Google's maturity as an organization that Yegge remains employed at Google and his criticism remains online, albeit hosted by a third-party Google+ account.

The gist of his argument is that Amazon gets platforms and Google doesn't. That's less true today than it was then -- Yegge's observations evidently were noticed by Google management. But the rant continues to be relevant for Google and for any company operating a platform business or thinking about doing so.

A choice passage:

Google+ is a knee-jerk reaction, a study in short-term thinking, predicated on the incorrect notion that Facebook is successful because they built a great product. But that's not why they are successful. Facebook is successful because they built an entire constellation of products by allowing other people to do the work.

Yegge's rant is made more meaningful by his follow-up post a week later. And it contrasts with subsequent observations about how he believes Amazon "is in the bottom half of the industry in terms of being a nice place to work" and Google "is undoubtedly in the top 0.1% of the best places to work in the world, across anything even remotely computer-related."

James Whittaker, Google: Why I Left Google
A former professor of computer science at the University of Florida, Whittaker founded a security software firm, joined Microsoft, left for Google, and then returned to Microsoft. He left Google early last year, disenchanted with the changes brought about by CEO Larry Page. His widely read public letter, "Why I Left Google," is perhaps the best known of a small but apparently growing list of public departure letters -- see also Spencer Tipping's "Why I Left Google" and Douglas Bowman's "Goodbye, Google."

Whittaker recounts how Google went from being an innovative, decentralized company under Eric Schmidt to an advertising machine focused solely on remaking itself in the image of Facebook through Google+.

His criticism about Google+ still resonates:

Sharing was working fine and dandy, Google just wasn't part of it. People were sharing all around us and seemed quite happy. A user exodus from Facebook never materialized. I couldn't even get my own teenage daughter to look at Google+ twice: "Social isn't a product," she told me after I gave her a demo. "Social is people and the people are on Facebook." Google was the rich kid who, after discovering he wasn't invited to the party, built his own party in retaliation. The fact that no one came to Google's party became the elephant in the room.

And yet as Whittaker himself admits in his post, "Truth is, I've never been much on advertising." Google is an advertising company and advertising has gone social, perhaps unavoidably and forever. The good old days when the web was free, the NSA sought permission to listen, and we were ignorant about how web services and Soylent Green were made -- OMG, it's people's data! -- are long gone, if they were ever anything more than self-delusion.

Brad Garlinghouse, Yahoo: The Peanut Butter Manifesto
Yahoo's low point came in late 2010. But in 2006, Brad Garlinghouse, then Yahoo senior VP, saw where things were headed. In an internal memo leaked to The Wall Street Journal, he castigated the company for its lack of vision, ownership, and accountability, using a rather odd metaphor:

I've heard our strategy described as spreading peanut butter across the myriad opportunities that continue to evolve in the online world. The result: a thin layer of investment spread across everything we do and thus we focus on nothing in particular.

I hate peanut butter. We all should.

Let it be said that peanut butter is awesome, unless you're allergic to it. But otherwise Garlinghouse was on to something. Had Yahoo's management at the time paid more attention, perhaps its recovery would not have taken so long.

Earlier this year, Garlinghouse posted a follow-up note through LinkedIn, in which he suggests the problems he identified were merely symptoms of a larger problem: failed corporate culture. The good news is that Marissa Mayer appears to be dealing with that, without disparaging everyone's favorite lifesaving, nutrient-rich, nutty spread.

1 of 3
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Lorna Garey
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
11/21/2013 | 9:48:56 AM
Will These Still Happen?
Do you think the days of big-tech executives, even staffers, being this candid are over, or at least ending? An example is how "politician-like" many execs are now, and that these are more and more publically traded companies, where it's just not OK to let it all hang out, unless you want the SEC breathing down your neck.
User Rank: Author
11/21/2013 | 9:37:27 AM
Re: Peanut butter
Apart from thinking that peanut butter is the most vile food on the planet, I love this piece. I love it when senior executives tell it like it is, or at least what they really think. Unfortunately, many of these rants came after the execs had moved on. The Google exec's public criticism of his own company, while he was there, and Google's decision to not cover it up say a lot (positive) about the company.
User Rank: Author
11/21/2013 | 9:11:31 AM
Re: Peanut butter
People respect people who call it like it is. In the peanut butter case, he was right.

But this is one of my favorite passages, re the Gates memo: "If you look over The Internet Tidal Wave, the absence of one term stands out: "Mobile" doesn't occur once." And here we are in the middle of the MS Surface dilemma. Imagine if Bill Gates and Michael Dell had built the first big tablet, instead of Steve Jobs.

User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2013 | 9:10:28 AM
"We know from painful experience that letting a third-party layer of software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in substandard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform. If developers grow dependent on third-party development libraries and tools, they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available to our developers."

It's rather skillful that a rant about keeping proprietary control was essentially wrapped up in the exact same arguement against another company
Kristin Burnham
Kristin Burnham,
User Rank: Author
11/21/2013 | 8:58:49 AM
Peanut butter
I think Brad Garlinghouse's peanut butter memo is great. Straight to the point and effective (though I have to disagree with his particular stance on peanut butter itself).
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll