Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
8/8/2012
05:09 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple Design Expert 'Confused' Samsung For iPhone

Susan Kare, an original Mac icon designer, testifies Samsung menus are "substantially" similar to the iPhone's, to the point that she mixed up the smartphones.

Apple iPhone 5 Vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: What We Know
Apple iPhone 5 Vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: What We Know
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
More expert testimony poured into the courtroom Tuesday to support Apple's claims that Samsung infringed its iPhone and iPad design patents. But Samsung's attorneys keep chipping away at what sometimes seems like a wall of evidence against it. In one or two instances, a ray of light shone through to illuminate Samsung's side of the case.

Since the July 30 opening of the trial, each day has started and ended with the attorneys from both sides wrangling over what phone features may be blown up in illustrations, which documents are legitimately part of evidence, and which phones they agreed could be shown to the jury. There are 175 phone exhibits in this case.

Samsung, unlike Apple, makes dozens of variations of its phones and upgrades different models each year. That's true, in part, because each telecommunications carrier wants phones different from its competitors' deices. Verizon sells the Fascinate; AT&T offers the Captivate; Sprint sells the Galaxy S 4G Touch; T-Mobile offers the Galaxy S II and the Vibrant. That means Samsung introduces 50 new phones a year and is manufacturing up to 100 different models at any given time. That's the opposite of Apple, which introduces one new model of the iPhone once a year.

The company cultures are opposite as well. Harold McElhinny's opening statement July 31 said not only did Samsung copy Apple's market-leading product design, but that the copying was deliberate. Apple, he said, would prove not only that it occurred, but it was supported in the highest ranks of the company.

[ Learn how Samsung's attorney made testifying difficult for Peter Bressler, one of Apple's expert witness. See Samsung Challenges Key Apple Witness' Expertise. ]

In an under-reported response, Samsung's Justin Denison said he and other Samsung executives found the Apple charges "very offensive. At Samsung, we are very, very proud of all the products we have produced and all the hard work that goes into bringing them to market."

Samsung led the market, including Apple, in offering voice recognition and advanced touchscreen technology, he said. It also had the first cloud-based video service in the United States.

"When Apple followed you, did you feel ripped off? Were you outraged?" Samsung attorney John Quinn asked him.

"No," answered Denison both times. Samsung is a "humble culture, constantly self critical ... not satisfied with what it's done so far" in the market. It expects other companies to eventually match what it does and tries to stay ahead through skill in design, manufacturing, and a readiness to adopt new technical approaches.

"What we want to do is to continue to compete ... to deliver the best technology possible," he said.

Nowhere was this difference in culture and self-description more evident than Tuesday's testimony on the icons used on each company's smartphones and how they were conceived. To illustrate its claims of copying, Apple showed a screen of Samsung's Galaxy application menu page alongside the iPhone's home page.

Expert witness Susan Kare, an independent graphic designer formerly with Apple, is best known for creating the icons used on the first Apple Macintosh and is a leading expert on computer pixel art. Upon questioning, she named 11 Samsung phone models that, she said, showed "a substantial similarity" to the iPhone's application menu layouts.

She based that judgment on "an overall visual comparison" in which she noted: "the regular grid, the rows of four icons, the colorful mix of icons that are square with rounded corners." She cited the similarity of the clocks, text labeling, and use of a sunflower in icons on both companies' devices.

These icon screens were so closely matched that they "could be confusing to the customer," she said, even though she hadn't spoken to a customer who found them confusing. She then illustrated the point by saying when she reached for an iPhone on a table of phones during a consultation with Apple attorneys, she inadvertently picked up a Samsung model.

"My point of view is pretty granular on graphic images. I guess I became confused," she said.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sorbon156
50%
50%
sorbon156,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/13/2012 | 9:57:09 PM
re: Apple Design Expert 'Confused' Samsung For iPhone
The whole Apple v Samsung case is an illustration of legal exports ignoring the history of portable computing. Firstly, the Apple could be viewed as an old HP/Compaq TC1100 slate slimmed down and substituting a finger for a styles. Neither of these are new; they are simply the incorporation of new technology into a 9 year old system. Icons on a rectangular grid? Design patent? Rounded v square corners? Cartesian instead of curvilinear coordinates?Come on guys.

Then there was the iPaq PocketPC PDA/phone lineage that anybody can look at on Google Images. How on earth did this trial get this far?
Mack Knife
50%
50%
Mack Knife,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/8/2012 | 2:46:13 PM
re: Apple Design Expert 'Confused' Samsung For iPhone
What? An Apple product designer confused? I can tell the difference and so can millions of customers buying something other than an iPad or iPhone. We are to believe that the people buying products made by Samsung are confused as they actually wanted to buy Apple products instead? Really?

If an Apple product designer can't figure out the difference, are the "Geniuses" employed by Apple to help customers just as confused?

What Samsung should ask is how many people took their Samsung products to an Apple store for assistance since Apple claims they are so similar in appearance.

The only thing Apple is accomplishing here is to make itself look foolish.

The spiral downturn for Apple. Check back in a few years and all you'll find left of Apple is a pack of lawyers fighting over a bad core.
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps – and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - September 10, 2014
A high-scale relational database? NoSQL database? Hadoop? Event-processing technology? When it comes to big data, one size doesn't fit all. Here's how to decide.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.