Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
5/5/2014
12:40 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple Vs. Samsung: Apple Wins Battle But Losing War?

A jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, but Apple's courtroom victories aren't slowing Android's smartphone market success.

Microsoft Office For iPad: 7 Questions Answered
Microsoft Office For iPad: 7 Questions Answered
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Apple scored another win from a California jury late Friday afternoon. The jury ruled mostly in Apple's favor, agreeing that Samsung violated some of Apple's patents and owes the iPhone maker damages. The amount awarded, however, was less than 5% of what Apple wanted. Further, Apple was found to have violated one of Samsung's patents. Apple's "holy war" against Android has scored victories in individual skirmishes, but the larger campaign is going nowhere.

The trial, held in San Jose during April and presided over by US District Court Judge Lucy Koh, went to the jury just last week. Where the first trial, held in 2012, focused mostly on hardware, this trial focused on software and individual features of the iOS and Android operating systems. The members of the jury spent three and a half days deliberating the case before coming to a decision.

Apple alleged Samsung had violated four patents. The jury saw differently, convicting Samsung of violating two patents: data tapping (making calls from within an email) and auto-complete. Judge Koh had found Samsung guilty of violating Apple's slide-to-unlock patent earlier in the trial. The jury cleared Samsung of violating a patent related to Siri and another related to data synchronization.

[Samsung turns to software development as its competition against Apple and Google heats up. Read Samsung's Next Frontier: Apps.]

The jury awarded Apple $119.6 million in damages for the data-tapping and slide-to-unlock patents, but it didn't award any damages for the auto-complete patent. Koh ordered the jury to reassess the auto-complete damages, saying that Apple is due some sort of award for the violation. The jury reconvenes Monday to deliberate on a dollar amount. Whatever amount the jury agrees on will likely not come close to the $2.2 billion Apple believed it was owed. The $119.6 million awarded by the jury is peanuts in comparison, and it might not even cover the expense of the trial itself. Most importantly, Apple was unsuccessful in preventing Samsung from selling the infringing devices in the US.

(Source: samsung-updates.com)
(Source: samsung-updates.com)

Samsung managed to score a minor victory itself during the trial. It had alleged that Apple was violating two of its patents. The jury agreed on one count and awarded Samsung $158,000.

Apple was awarded $930 million in the 2012 trial. With the two verdicts combined, Samsung might owe Apple more than $1.05 billion. That's a huge chunk of change, no doubt, but Samsung is still free to sell the infringing devices in the US and other markets. Android, the operating system on Samsung's devices, has made incredible strides in conquering the worldwide smartphone market. Globally, Android is on 78% of smartphones. Android debuted about 15 months after Apple's first iPhone and surpassed it quickly, thanks to support from dozens of manufacturers that have churned out wave after wave of impressive devices.

Meanwhile, Apple has done little more than to iterate on the iPhone over the last few years. It still sells tens of millions of iPhones each quarter, but it has also continued to lose market share as Android and its supporters have out-innovated Apple in recent quarters. Apple has consistently stated that it doesn't want to sell the most devices; it wants to sell the best devices.

Apple has court cases pending against Samsung and other smartphone makers in countries around the world. It may have technically beat Samsung in the US last week, but the small damages awarded are clearly more of a win for Samsung than for Apple. Apple might do well to pause and reassess just how effective its anti-Android campaign has been and what priorities it should be moving forward.

What do Uber, Bank of America, and Walgreens have to do with your mobile app strategy? Find out in the new Maximizing Mobility issue of InformationWeek Tech Digest.

Eric is a freelance writer for InformationWeek specializing in mobile technologies. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Liquidfire3d
50%
50%
Liquidfire3d,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/5/2014 | 5:38:05 PM
Android vs Apple
Samsung will be the one hunting Apple down for patent infringement in the future because Apple no longer innovates. http://youtu.be/GQl47P9grhc
Thomas Claburn
100%
0%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
5/5/2014 | 4:40:08 PM
Re: Is Apple selling betamax
But Apple does care about the number of devices Samsung sells. It can't afford to ignore market share completely. It has seen what happened to BlackBerry.
Susan Fourtané
0%
100%
Susan Fourtané,
User Rank: Ninja
5/5/2014 | 3:12:03 PM
Re: Is Apple selling betamax
Edward, 

"Apple has consistently stated that it doesn't want to sell the most devices; it wants to sell the best devices."

It seems like it doesn't matter how many times Apple states that; some people love to create a war between iOS and Android where there is no real war. Apple can't care less about how many devices Samsung sells. Apple wants its patents to be respected. Who wouldn't. Samsung consistently has violated quite many Apple patents. 

-Susan 

 
EdwardS956
100%
0%
EdwardS956,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/5/2014 | 1:14:33 PM
Is Apple selling betamax
"...(Apple) has also continued to lose market share as Android...  Apple has consistently stated that it doesn't want to sell the most devices; it wants to sell the best devices."  Sounds like the old betamax vs VHS battle all over again.
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps – and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - September 10, 2014
A high-scale relational database? NoSQL database? Hadoop? Event-processing technology? When it comes to big data, one size doesn't fit all. Here's how to decide.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.