Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
8/27/2012
06:10 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over

Samsung lost an important legal round to Apple. But looking ahead, Google has Android patent weapons of its own.

Apple iPhone 5 Vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: What We Know
Apple iPhone 5 Vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: What We Know
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Apple's triumph over Samsung in its patent infringement case will benefit Apple in the short term, prolonging the survival of its high profit margins and limiting competitive pressures from Android hardware makers. But the billions Apple could reap in damages and future licensing fees won't be enough to cripple Samsung, or Google, the power behind Android.

What's more, Apple's victory aids Microsoft, a company that competes with Google and also covets Apple's mobile business. Opening the door to Windows Phone in order to shut it on Android doesn't make Apple's mobile products more compelling or strengthen the foundation of Apple's business.

The jury's decision to award over $1 billion in damages to Apple has hit Samsung hard, at least as much as a company with $148.6 billion in 2011 sales can be harmed by being forced to pay less than 1% of its revenue at some later date, after the appeals have potentially reduced the fine. Samsung characterizes the verdict as a loss for the American consumer rather than a win for Apple.

The decision, the company said in an emailed statement "will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. Consumers have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products."

[ Besides Apple, who else won as a result of the verdict? Read Apple Verdict Could Boost Microsoft, RIM Smartphones. ]

Samsung says that this is not the final word in the case and that it will persevere in other legal venues around with world, where some Apple claims have already been rejected. And it insists it "will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer."

Karen Lisko, senior litigation consultant with Persuasion Strategies, a litigation advice group within the law firm of Holland and Hart, sees Apple's win as having a significant effect on future jurors. "The jury pool for the next trial is watching this case and this total rout in favor of Apple will not escape notice," she said in a phone interview.

"Given this outcome, other companies are going to have to work harder to skirt around Apple's patents because they've been warned now," she said.

The goal of the patent system, she said, is to promote innovation and Samsung can demonstrate that and avoid future infringement claims with relatively minor changes. However, she said, given the ruling favoring Apple, juries may want to see more than minor changes if and when Apple brings future patent claims against Samsung or other Android handset makers.

Samsung, she said, erred during the trial in focusing so heavily on the competitive impact of Apple's patents. "When you're defending a case in a patent infringement lawsuit, you first have to focus on your strong attempts to work around the patent," she said, noting that the Patent and Trademark Office is highly respected by most jurors. "Samsung should have focused more on what it does well as a company instead of saying that Apple should not have gotten these patents. Jurors often shut down when the defendant goes after the jugular of the plaintiff."

Apple meanwhile is showing no such restraint. On Monday, the iPhone maker filed to ban eight Samsung products as a consequence of its patent win. It is seeking an injunction on the sale of four Galaxy S2 models, two Galaxy S models, the Droid Charge, and the Galaxy Prevail. Judge Lucy Koh, who has been overseeing the case, is expected to rule on the request at a later date.

Brian J. Love, assistant professor of law at Santa Clara University, said in a phone interview that he expects Samsung will attempt to persuade the judge to set aside the verdict and to rule as a matter of law on various issues. He said that if Judge Koh enters a permanent injunction against the many Samsung products at issue in the case then he'd expect an appeal. He said there's a good chance the federal circuit would stay such an injunction during an appeal. That could take a year or more.

A further delay would soften the impact of any injunction because the products in question would no longer be relevant in the market. "These phones are already at least a year old," Love said. "In another year, [after the appeal], they'd be two-years-old. These product life cycles are short. There's a good chance Samsung would be ready to let these products phase out on their own."

Google, meanwhile, can be expected to develop software patches to alter Android, like the one it released in July to obviate an injunction on Samsung's Galaxy Nexus, said Love. That patch altered the way search worked on the phone, to get around an Apple universal search patent.

As for Apple's design patents, Love doesn't see these as being problems for Android handset makers going forward. Getting around design patents is usually pretty trivial, he said, because they cover ornamentation rather than function. However, he acknowledged that the cost can become substantial if it means retooling an assembly line.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
mmuldoon52501
50%
50%
mmuldoon52501,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/30/2012 | 7:59:09 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
So sad that his trial was allowed to take place in Apple's back yard. The first thing that should happen with any Silicone Valley technical lawsuit is a change of venue to somewhere in the Midwest. As a large portion of our population deals with agriculture in some manner we know when something stinks.
Flyingdog5000
50%
50%
Flyingdog5000,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/29/2012 | 8:29:29 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
Apple actually lost on the rectangle with round corners count, so Samsung is doing a pretty good spin job saying otherwise.
achen907
50%
50%
achen907,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2012 | 8:19:00 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
Really?!? Apple won the case because they invented the round corner on the phone? What a basic shape has become a 1 billion dollar claim?!

Apple is beyond ridiculous in this case. I smell greed, absolute arrogant and no restrain as bully in the tech world. Their product is not revolution in design or innovative. They simply improve from existing product. Palm has the early tablet concept. Xerox has the early touch screen. Nokia, Sony Erricson create mobile phone. Should they all also sue Apple for infringement of their patent too?

While at it, maybe BMW could sue Mercedez for copying their round shape head light and red tail light.... absolute rubbish.

This is why I hate Apple and their fanatics minions. Common sense....gone with eaten apple.
tnoon
50%
50%
tnoon,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2012 | 8:09:50 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
Now it is time for the Government to step in with its "antitrust" case like it did with the Bell System, IBM, Microsoft etc.
gtigerclaw
50%
50%
gtigerclaw,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2012 | 7:17:40 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
"Apple's triumph over Samsung in its patent infringement case..." Unfortunately, Thomas, it's hardly a "triumph" when Samsung lawyers are already appealing it in the courts. You should do a little better research before you write an article.

This is just the first round of a long court court battle that could well backfire on Apple - big time. It's not an Apple Triumph until the game's over.
jkosin236
50%
50%
jkosin236,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2012 | 5:09:03 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
With this expect Apple to go after all the others with similar suites!
The gloves are off and Apple knows it can win the case; so, expect them to go after all the others imitating anything that looks remotely like an iPhone.
halseyjr61
50%
50%
halseyjr61,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2012 | 3:48:14 PM
re: Apple Wins, But Android Game Not Over
With this infringement case Apple has effectively embarrassed itself and the US (as Apple is the US's premier consumer technology company). Apple products are revolutionary in design and innovation but Apple is not 'leap years' ahead of it's competitors.
Apple products are overpriced and it's competitors work to produce competing products that offer near same innovation and in some cases better and introduce these products to the consumer at fairer prices.
Samsung did not have a prayer in that this case was heard in a California courthouse a mere 20 miles away from Apple's headquarters. Jurors were obviously residents in this geographic location and automatically gave Apple an immense advantage.
I am an American and very patriotic. With this in mind I love to see the US remain as a world leader in technology but remain a leader in fair play. Samsung is highly regarded by me. Their products are excellent and world-class and I believe that Samsung did not intentionally infringe on any existing patents Apple or others hold. The smart phone market requires standardization of certain technologies in order for for the entire communications system to work (IE data from a Apple phone connecting to a phone made by Samsung). We cannot have the difficulties we had in the past with the likes of Philips cassette tape vs 8-track, VHS vs Beta, HDDVD vs BluRay etc. A common platform must be established which will enable the segment to work and interact and this must be done without the fear of a manufacturer developing new technologies and features to an established platform.
Google graciously and intelligently offered it's technology to all smart phone developers to work on and that is world-class.
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government Oct. 20, 2014
Energy and weather agencies are busting long-held barriers to analyzing big data. Can the feds now get other government agencies into the movement?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and trends on InformationWeek.com
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.