Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
2/4/2014
09:37 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

Future Cars Will Talk To Each Other

NHTSA gives the green light to develop rules for vehicle-to-vehicle communication systems which let cars converse. Will this prevent crashes?

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mathew Clarke
50%
50%
Mathew Clarke,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2014 | 9:30:08 AM
Re: Modifications
It is a great idea to adopt the vehicle to vehicle communication system to avoid car crash as well as accident. It is a great way of prevention from my point of view. If cars will communicate with each other then they may inform the other driver inside an another car about their activity and it will help the driver of the car to stay alert. We really need such type of technologies. As we have achieved great things with such technology then we can expect to have this technology. Hopefully our car makers will do proper testing and will add some userfriendly aspect so that the technology will perform the best in our car. Sometimes we face problem in our car. If we are not a professional then it is better to check up our car from a professional car repair center and solve out all issues.

Mercedes Repair Millis, MA
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
2/5/2014 | 4:19:21 PM
Re: Modifications
>Just like people can reprogram or tamper with aspects of their car's computers to boost horsepower or throttle response, no doubt there will be a market for people to modify the data sent (how fast it's going, etc).

Having seen how fear of hackers has led to draconian laws like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, it seems likely we'll have extreme penalties for anyone hacking automaker DRM. The hacking penalty will probably exceed the speeding penalty.
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
2/5/2014 | 3:39:20 PM
Another Horrific Idea from Big Bother
So now we can all look forward to having our motor vehicles hacked and 100 car pile ups in addition to our consumer data because anyone paying attention knows that American Big Business is incapable of protecting data of any sort.  See also the numerous data breaches of Target, Neiman Marcus, et al >> http://www.privacyrights.org/data-breach 
Gary_EL
100%
0%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
2/4/2014 | 11:49:56 PM
Start Small
Before anyone tries to do anything quite as sweeping as this, here's something much simpler which might well lay a solid foundation for cars talking to each other. Why not start out by having them talk to traffic signals? If at an intersection where, say, the North-South road has the green light and there are no more cars waiting to go, why not give the 15 cars waiting on East-West that are stuck on the red the OK to move? In other words, dynamic adjustment of the light cycle based on the situation. Not only are the technical problems a whole degree of freedom simpler, but the legal challenges of writing the laws to cover the changes will be simpler, too.

 
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
2/4/2014 | 10:41:09 PM
Re: What about the good?
You mention reducing traffic congestion -- there could be a convenience incentive there, where people who consent to V2V controls and certain monitoring can ride in V2V lanes, like the HOV lanes. 
Kristin Burnham
50%
50%
Kristin Burnham,
User Rank: Author
2/4/2014 | 2:40:47 PM
What about the good?
I'll take the contrarian view, here. No doubt people will resist it, but what about the good it could do?

"...the technology 'has the potential to help drivers avoid or mitigate 70% to 80% of vehicle crashes involving unimpaired drivers, and that could help prevent many thousands of deaths and injuries on our roads every year.'"

For parents of teenage drives, especially, I'm sure they'd welcome this technology.
ekholbrook
50%
50%
ekholbrook,
User Rank: Strategist
2/4/2014 | 12:19:40 PM
Modifications
Just like people can reprogram or tamper with aspects of their car's computers to boost horsepower or throttle response, no doubt there will be a market for people to modify the data sent (how fast it's going, etc).

The other bigger real aspect I see is it will car sales. How?

Why would anyone buy a car that can go over 55mph if everyime you do, it sends you a ticket? You will in one fell swoop, kill any reason to buy a car over $10,000. Don't think Detroit, or Europe, or Asia will be too thrilled. 
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
2/4/2014 | 10:03:17 AM
Creepy
Persistent monitoring strikes me as really intrusive, and I'm glad Tom mentioned potential uses of this data, including automatic fines or changes in insurance rates. I wonder if consumers will have the option to switch off these kinds of functions.
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and trends on InformationWeek.com
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.