Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
2/26/2014
09:45 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Glass Prompts Attack, Woman Claims

Alleged assault appears to have arisen from a desire not to be videotaped.

Mobile World Congress: 5 Hot Gadgets
Mobile World Congress: 5 Hot Gadgets
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

A woman says she was assaulted for wearing Google Glass at a San Francisco bar on Friday evening, the latest in a series of confrontations that belie the city's longstanding reputation for tolerance.

On her Facebook page, Sarah Slocum, contributing editor at social news site Newsdad and resident of San Mateo, Calif., wrote that she was verbally and physically assaulted and robbed "because of some wanker Google Glass haters." She claims one of her assailants, a man, grabbed her Glass from her face and ran outside and that his friends stole her purse, wallet, and cellphone. She says she recovered her Glass but has not found her other possessions.

A San Francisco Police Department spokesman confirmed that a police report about the incident has been filed and is under investigation. The woman got into an argument with three individuals, the spokesman said, adding "The argument was over the suspects' belief that the woman was taping them without consent."

At least some of the time during the altercation, Slocum was doing just that. According to KPIX, Slocum said her Glass contains video of the man she says tore the device from her head.

[Class warfare has erupted in the Bay Area. See Silicon Valley's 1%: Stinginess Is Not The Problem.]

In a Facebook post, Slocum said she began taping only after the confrontation began. "I wasn't even videotaping until I felt threatened after the one girl turned around and gave me the bird for no reason," she explained.

Glass does not display a red light when it is recording like some video devices, but Google says that Glass was designed with explicit signals to indicate when video recording has been initiated (a gesture or a voice command) and when recording is active (an illuminated screen).

The police spokesman said he believes Slocum planned to provide some video to investigators. He said he didn't know whether the investigators have received the video or have been able to identify anyone in the video.

Slocum did not immediately respond to a request for an interview.

The incident occurred at Molotov's, a "dive bar" in San Francisco's Lower Haight neighborhood, and several people commenting on Slocum's Facebook posts blame her for the assault or question her account of that evening's events.

(Image credit: Google)
(Image credit: Google)

Marc Canter, a founder of Macromedia and entrepreneur who left the Bay Area five years ago for Cleveland, said in a response to Slocum's post, "Punk bars are NOT for hipster babes to come in and show off their geeky whatever the hell. Have you no common sense?"

Reached by phone, and asked how much Slocum should be blamed for the assault, Canter said, "It's 100% her, dude," explaining that she could have walked into any bar in the Marina district without incident.

At another online discussion of the incident, one person said it was unacceptable to blame the victim. "Absent the bar owners telling her to knock it off, she has every legal right to film as little or much as she wants," an individual posting as "The Colonel" wrote. "Just like anyone else in there with their phone. They may not like it, they may even ask the Molotov's manager to ask her to stop/leave, but none of that has ANYTHING to do with them beating and robbing her."

Canter said people like Slocum don't have a clue what the tech industry has done to San Francisco, adding later, "I actually like her and she's a nice person," even as he suggested Slocum was using the incident to improve her social media brand.

"This is all about the frustration of no jobs and these rich kids coming in and raising prices," Canter said. "It's not the San Francisco I remember... That's not to say that the techies are personally responsible, but we are talking about an ecosystem and the changing of the guard."

Resentment over the diminishing supply of affordable housing in the San Francisco Bay Area, and over corporate buses using public transit accommodations without adequate compensation, has manifest itself in several class-oriented confrontations recently.

Twice in December, small groups of demonstrators staged protests at bus stops where Google's coaches were picking up passengers, one in San Francisco and one in Oakland. During the protest near the West Oakland BART Station, some of the demonstrators broke a Google bus window and slashed its tires.

The following month, a group calling itself Counterforce protested in front of the Berkeley home of Google engineer Anthony Levandowski, who works on Google's self-driving car project.

These incidents led Google to hire a ferry to carry commuting workers over water between Redwood City and San Francisco to catch a commuter bus that travels to the company's Mountain View headquarters. The company has also hired security guards to protect its employees.

Last week, Google issued guidelines for Google Glass wearers, advising them not to be a rude, creepy, or a "Glasshole." And according to Reuters, the company is lobbying in at least three states against rules being considered in eight states that could prohibit using Google Glass while driving.

But Google has further work to do before Glass is universally accepted. Canter observed, "I have yet to figure out what anyone does with Google Glass except surreptitiously videotaping people."

Engage with Oracle president Mark Hurd, NFL CIO Michelle McKenna-Doyle, General Motors CIO Randy Mott, Box founder Aaron Levie, UPMC CIO Dan Drawbaugh, GE Power CIO Jim Fowler, and other leaders of the Digital Business movement at the InformationWeek Conference and Elite 100 Awards Ceremony, to be held in conjunction with Interop in Las Vegas, March 31 to April 1, 2014. See the full agenda here.

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 10:22:13 AM
Who's Fault?
So it's her fault she was attacked and robbed? Bad judgment, maybe. But I've been in enough dive bars in my life to know that acting like a "hipster" isn't an excuse for assualt and robbery.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 11:44:42 AM
Re: Who's Fault?
"Canter said, 'It's 100% her, dude.'" This Canter guy evidently has a taste for hyperbole. Dude, "100%"? Really?

I agree, Rob; Maybe it's not a great idea to wear Google Glass into certain venues-- but to assign blame to the victim??? Unless there's a lot more to this story, that's ridiculous.
Lorna Garey
100%
0%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 11:55:11 AM
Re: Who's Fault?
OK, let's be real: The biggest crime here was against fashion. Who goes out to a club wearing an ugly set of Google Glasses?
RobPreston
100%
0%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 11:59:13 AM
Re: Who's Fault?
...someone looking for attention. And she got the wrong kind.
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
2/26/2014 | 12:01:06 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
Nobody should blame her for the violence, that was clearly way too far. However, some measure of blame for at the very least, rudeness, if not somewhat anti-social behaiour, could be considered in her case. 

If someone is looking in your direction with a Glass headset on and you aren't familiar with its recording clues (though the fact that Google didn't opt for a red light suggests it's somewhat ok with the idea of stealthy recording) it would be the same as someone standing there with their phone pointed in your direction. You might assume they were filming you. 

While that should never give you the right to attack someone physically, asking them to stop shouldn't be beyond the realm of possibility. 
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 12:20:31 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
You're right; Google Glass bring up interesting social contracts. This incident happened inside a bar, in which case other patrons might have a reasonable expectation against being recorded without their consent by other customers. Certainly, the bar can (as some others already have) ban Google Glass and similar devices from being worn inside the premises.

But what about on the street? People are already legally allowed to take pictures of virtually anything they want in a public space. Google Glass will be a lot trickier in situations like that.

But the incident in SF seems to be about more than privacy inside a dive bar; it also seems to be about growing sentiment within the city that the tech boom is ruining local culture. Canter's comments in this article reflects that viewpoint, and the SF Chronicle's report on this incident tapped the same vein.

If the issue is not only privacy but also social inequity, this kind of aggression makes no sense-- just like the Google bus vandalism didn't. I think for a lot of angry people in the city, the focal point shouldn't be that techies are paid so well, given so many great perks, and positioned to have such a big impact on the rental market; wage and social inequality issues are systemic, much bigger than Google buses, and they should be treated as such.
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 12:25:44 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
Well said, Rob:  "...someone looking for attention. And she got the wrong kind."

Certainly she didn't deserve to be robbed. But the incident does illustrate how the use of Google Glass pushes into uncomfortable social territory -- and people's reactions aren't always going to be "Gee whiz."
Somedude8
50%
50%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Ninja
2/26/2014 | 2:03:18 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
Sounds like the start of a bad joke "A hipster and Glass walk in to a punk bar".

I can't help but run the movie in my head here:

Hipster/tech person, wearing Glass, walks in to a punk bar in a shady neighborhood. She is probably the only one in the bar with no tatoos, no boots, and no scars. At this point she has two options:

Option 1: Get out. Fast.

Option 2: Stay.

This is a lot like me grabbing my steering wheel, yanking it hard to one side, then blaming Honda that I hit a parked car. This is so beyond any reasonable measure of normal behavior and rection to an obviously bad situation, that I have to wonder if she didn't stage the whole thing. Its too much to believe. This may be like an aspiring celebrities 'leaked' sex tape.
cbr600f4
100%
0%
cbr600f4,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/26/2014 | 4:02:09 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
BY all reports her "dude" threw the first punch at those asking her to not record them. 

None of this story is a blanket statement on life in SF or even about Google Glasses. It is a tiny story about a dumb girl and her obnoxious violent friends with terrible city skills and lack of respect towards other bar patrons, nothing more. She must be incredibly naive (and very drunk as persons who were there report) for thinking Molotov's was the right place to take unwanted pictures of bar goers while calling them "White Trash" at the same time. Did she really think her FRIEND throwing the first punch is not an issue but we should consider getting a towel thrown at her as a violent hate crime? Did she really believe leaving her purse and phone unattended in a bar at 1:30am with a bunch of rough and tumble drunks was a good idea when her friends start a fight? Had she not been so easily scammed out of her belongings there would not even be a story here. How fragile and out of touch is this woman? On her Facebook rant the people who were in the bar are telling a completely different story, or chiding her for exaggerating  With the glasses on perhaps she is living in a special virtual reality where the rules of common sense don't apply."
Kristin Burnham
50%
50%
Kristin Burnham,
User Rank: Author
2/26/2014 | 4:15:22 PM
Re: Who's Fault?
Is using Glass really any different than someone using their phone at a bar to surreptitiously video a confrontation? You don't often hear about those problems, but introduc Glass and it becomes a whole new beast.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Building A Mobile Business Mindset
Among 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps – and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July10, 2014
When selecting servers to support analytics, consider data center capacity, storage, and computational intensity.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join InformationWeek’s Lorna Garey and Mike Healey, president of Yeoman Technology Group, an engineering and research firm focused on maximizing technology investments, to discuss the right way to go digital.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.