The iWatch, or whatever Apple would call its "watch-like device," had better do something really clever and useful. The Dick Tracy watch has been attempted and laughed off the market before. Surely Apple is thinking of what to do beyond the phone and tablet, but it has to be better than this.
In terms of description, that's about as far as it goes for the WSJ article. The article says what is obvious, that it would work with other Apple devices, and discusses other "wearable technology" and devices manufactured at Chinese manufacturing giant Foxconn, with which Apple has discussed the device, according to the WSJ. The NYT article adds that it has "curved glass."
The lack of detail raises the question of what such a device would do. Why would you want one? Will there be a diminutive ladies version?
The screen on any wrist-based device would be too small to show much or provide much touch interaction, so it's a reasonable guess that a voice interface would be provided. But what would it do? It could be a mostly voice-controlled phone. It could be a GPS, but the screen would be too small for useful maps, so it could only do voice output, i.e. Siri telling you to turn left, etc. None of this seems all that compelling to me.
Either I lack Apple's imagination or Apple does. The company is still the big cheese in the tablet world and perhaps the most important player in the mobile phones, at least in the U.S. What next? Nobody else has come up with a compelling new consumer electronics device. Maybe even Apple can't do it anymore.
Building A Mobile Business MindsetAmong 688 respondents, 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Soon all apps will look like mobile apps – and it's past time for those with no plans to get cracking.