Most Americans Reluctant To Bank Online With Cell Phone
KPMG recently did a study of how consumers in the US engaged in online banking. The report said that 85 percent of those that participated in the survey "believe mobile banking is important but they do not want to pay for it" while 91 percent have never even tried use their bank's site through their phone.
KPMG recently did a study of how consumers in the US engaged in online banking. The report said that 85 percent of those that participated in the survey "believe mobile banking is important but they do not want to pay for it" while 91 percent have never even tried use their bank's site through their phone.The first thing you need, other than a cell phone of course, is a bank that supports it. A surprising number of banks have their own mobile banking site, like Charles Schwab, Bank of America and Wells Fargo just to name a few. In other cases, your carrier may help with online banking. For example, AT&T has a mobile banking application that is free, except for data charges that should be covered by your plan, that supports eleven financial institutions in the US. Chances are, one or more of your banks or brokerages supports mobile banking. Your company may even use a 401(k) service that has mobile banking support, which would allow you real time access to watch your 401(k) plan wither away in the current market.
Your bank should also provide this service for free. There is no reason they should try and charge you for this. Years ago I banked with Suntrust and they offered an excellent online banking system, but charged $8 per month to use it. I switched banks to one of their competitors that didn't charge and saved myself $96 per year. Banks have to understand that charging for this type of thing is a sure fire way to shed customers. The service is a convenience for users, so that attracts customers, and because customers can perform transactions without using an ATM, a branch teller or calling someone on the phone, it is saving the bank money. I am surprised that seven percent of the survey respondents said they would be willing to pay a fee for mobile banking. That is about seven percent more than I expected.
Banks go a long way to make sure their services are secure. It is really their money at risk, not yours. You should have a difficult to guess password of course. This can be a pain to set up on a phone that has a T9 input system, but it is worth the effort to have a mix of upper and lower case letters with a few numbers and symbols thrown in for good measure. That applies to all passwords you use, but especially to mobile and online banking.
If you've not tried it yet, go to your desktop and search for "mobile banking bankname" and see if they have it. Being able to check funds, transfer between accounts and even do a few stock/mutual fund trades on your phone is often more convenient than dragging out your laptop. When traveling, I'd never consider using a kiosk or strange computer either. Transmissions with your bank are secure. If your bank cannot establish a secure connection with the browser it won't let you in the site. However, you never know what keyloggers may be installed on a borrowed computer. In those cases, your phone may be the most secure device at your disposal.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?