Sony Ericsson: Yeah, We're Going To Wait For Android 2.0
Sony Ericsson may have joined the Open Handset Alliance, but it appears as though the company -- known for its music- and camera-centric mobile phones -- doesn't quite have faith in Android 1.0 or 1.5. It is going to wait for Android 2.0 before it brings any Android handsets to market.
Sony Ericsson may have joined the Open Handset Alliance, but it appears as though the company -- known for its music- and camera-centric mobile phones -- doesn't quite have faith in Android 1.0 or 1.5. It is going to wait for Android 2.0 before it brings any Android handsets to market.According to DigiTimes, Peter Ang, vice president of marketing, Asia Pacific at Sony Ericsson, recently said, "The Android 2.0 will have more multimedia support that the previous Android OS." That's a key area for Sony Ericsson to be concerned about.
Many of Sony Ericsson's higher-end phones fall in to one of two categories: The Walkman range or the CyberShot range. I'll give you two guesses as to what user demographics those two series target.
With such a key emphasis on multimedia capabilities, it is little wonder that Sony Ericsson would consider holding off until a more robust version of Android is available with better media capabilities.
Let's face it, the current iteration of Android is not setting the music-listening and picture-taking crowds on fire. Some of the major upgrades from Android 1.0 to Android 1.5 include better multimedia features, but they are still behind some of the competition.
Ang also said that the company will continue to support the Windows Mobile and Symbian platforms.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?