Sprint is launching a new marketing campaign, and it is all about speed. Conspicuously absent? Any real references to Nextel, which Sprint paid big bucks to merge with a couple of years ago. Does this spell the end of Nextel?
Sprint is launching a new marketing campaign, and it is all about speed. Conspicuously absent? Any real references to Nextel, which Sprint paid big bucks to merge with a couple of years ago. Does this spell the end of Nextel?Well, not entirely. Sprint says it is going to continue to enhance the Nextel National network. But Sprint seems to be refocusing its push-to-talk service, and says it is now going to be powered by "SprintSpeed". (Why can I hear Captain Kirk here? "Mr. Sulu, SprintSpeed, please.") Sprint makes no actual references to its iDEN network. On top of that, Sprint is already offering a slew of "blended" phones, that contain both CDMA and iDEN radios for combined functionality.
Sprint is hoping historical iDEN subscribers will choose these blended devices and eventually be won over by the CDMA features. The design behind this strategy is to get all Nextel iDEN subscribers to shift to CDMA phones so Sprint can sunset the iDEN network.
Speaking of CDMA, the press release speaks of Sprint's new slogan, Sprint Ahead, and how it is going to be the network of the future. There's certainly no reason to complain about the $7 billion that Sprint is going to invest in upgrading its CDMA EV-DO network to Revision A. Rev A will enhance business productivity by providing AirCard users with better wireless connecting speeds on both the uplink and downlink.
"Once you've experienced speed there's no going back," says Rich Silverstein, co-founder of Goodby, Silverstein & Partners. "Sprint allows us to get what we want, when we want it, and all at the speed of light. It's truly a magical experience."
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?