Mobile
News
9/4/2012
09:47 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Wearable Medical Technology Set To Take Off

Mobile health devices that monitor vital signs will become more standard, pushing market to $6 billion by 2016, says IMS Research.

10 Wearable Devices To Keep Patients Healthy
10 Wearable Devices To Keep Patients Healthy
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Mobile health devices that track vital signs are ready to take off, IMS Research predicts. According to a report on wearable technology, which includes devices such as glucose and heart monitors, the market was worth $2 billion in 2011 and will reach $6 billion by 2016. Correspondingly, 14 million wearable devices were shipped in 2011, and that number will likely rise to 171 million in 2016.

World Market for Wearable Technology--A Quantitative Market Assessment--2012 examines wearable electronic devices used in professional and consumer environments. IMS Research defines these devices as products that are worn on the user's body for an extended period of time and that contain advanced circuitry, wireless connectivity, and can process data.

According to the report, several shifts in the market will occur during the next four years that will increase demand for these products among patients as well as healthy individuals. As baby boomers age, they'll become a primary market for health devices such as blood pressure and glucose monitors that upload up-to-date information to caregivers.

Researchers also found that in 2011, glucose monitors accounted for most of the revenue in the health device segment of the market, reflecting the need for continuous data on blood glucose levels, particularly in Type I diabetes patients. The dominant wearable products in this category include continuous glucose monitors from Abbott and Medtronic.

[ There's almost no end to the amount of useful medical information available online. For seven valuable resources, see 7 Health Education Tools For Patients. ]

Activity monitors from Fitbit, Adidas miCoach, and Nike Fuelband are also popular with consumers, as are fitness and heart-rate monitors such as those from Garmin, Polar, and Suunto.

Wearable technology helps clinicians work more efficiently and extend care outside the hospital environment. When clinicians can collect information on patients anywhere and anytime, the increased knowledge can lead to earlier detection of problems, preventing readmission and resulting in better clinical outcomes, Theo Ahadome, senior analyst at IMS Research, said in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare.

"This will decrease the cost of healthcare in the long run," Ahadome predicts. "However, these benefits will need to be clearly proven in order for providers to adopt them and for payers to pay for them."

Another consideration is the deluge of data that these devices generate. For payers and providers, while these devices give better insights on a patient's medical condition, more data brings greater risk of data breaches and more responsibility to implement tighter security and access controls.

In addition to tighter data security, Ahadome foresees a change in clinical workflow as providers seek to accommodate a new way of tracking patients' health.

"Physicians need this data to be integrated into their IT systems, and [they] will have to change their workflow to accept and use this external data," Ahadome said. "There will be internal resistance from physicians who are used to standard patient visits. In the long run, once these issues are dealt with, it will lead to greater competition in the hospital and payer markets as patients begin to seek out those health organizations that deploy extended systems of care incorporating wearable technology."

InformationWeek Healthcare brought together eight top IT execs to discuss BYOD, Meaningful Use, accountable care, and other contentious issues. Also in the new, all-digital CIO Roundtable issue: Why use IT systems to help cut medical costs if physicians ignore the cost of the care they provide? (Free with registration.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Muthu LeesaJ889
50%
50%
Muthu LeesaJ889,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/23/2014 | 11:12:34 AM
Too much hype?
Google Glass did come with a bang! Though no signs of iWatch yet, let's hope Apple will not disappoint us either. Galaxy Gear smartwatches from Samsung, Pebble smartwatch, Sony Core etc. will constitute to the global wearable tech market that is expected to reach $4.6 billion this year. But is the hype really justified? http://mlabs.boston-technology.com/blog/wearable-technology-is-the-hype-justified-
RobertLatz
50%
50%
RobertLatz,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/26/2012 | 11:33:28 AM
re: Wearable Medical Technology Set To Take Off
A few thoughts...
First, we need to be able to connect the devices to the EHR. Second, we need to understand the meaning of the information. Third, we need to explore how much needs to be saved, and for how long.
This article addresses the first point. However, as noted by JaySimmons, there is data fatigue in looking at 'normal' data over and over again. On the flip side, alerts can be created (and individualized) to help one notice the outlier information. Even so, there are questions to be addressed in the future regarding how much variance is 'tolerable' vs when does this variance become 'important to listen to'.For example, if we have a patient wearing a Fitit device for 24 hours, we do not need to spend 24 hours to review the data, instead, we can use algorithms to identify the variances.
Regarding the saving of data, this will become interesting, especially as video is recorded in the future. Even so, in the example of the Fitbit device, do we really need to keep all 24 hours of information in the EHR? Or, can we pull only clips of data and then keep the report from the algorithm? In either case, how long do we store thsi data? Is it possible that tracking over time might help us uncover movement patterns that can be detected early on to prevent future changes in function?
In the future, as I put on my shirt with wearable sensors to measure my HR, BP, Resp, Temperature, and Movement patterns, I am not sure I will want all (or any) of this information sent to my EHR...but I will want the ability to track and learn about myself from this information, especially as I go on a hike or bike ride in the mountains. From this article, it appears that I am not the only one interested in this ability.
jaysimmons
50%
50%
jaysimmons,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/8/2012 | 9:37:15 PM
re: Wearable Medical Technology Set To Take Off
In my experience integrating glucometers in with an EHR, while many clinicians are initially excited about it they quickly develop data fatigue. Most just want to know the min, max, & average for the period of time for each time period. It's given me the feeling that sometimes you can give doctors too much info!
Jay Simmons
Information Week Contributor
InformationWeek Elite 100
InformationWeek Elite 100
Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - September 10, 2014
A high-scale relational database? NoSQL database? Hadoop? Event-processing technology? When it comes to big data, one size doesn't fit all. Here's how to decide.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.