Defense Information Systems Agency's contract is already reshaping the playing field for federal mobile players. But the lack of program details is a disservice to the broader mobile market.
DARPA Robot Challenge: Disaster Recovery
(click image for larger view)
DISA's recent $16 million mobile device management (MDM) and mobile application store (MAS) contract award to a team led by Digital Management Inc. was generally greeted as welcome news around the beltway and to the IT industry at large.
After all, the award by the Defense Information Systems Agency signaled the first massive, programmatic embrace of mobile technology by the U.S. government. The award also was seen as a potential jolt for future large-scale mobile deployments in a number of large, regulated private sector industries where mobile security remains a big concern.
In what should be a shining moment for federal mobility, it is unfortunate, though not unexpected, that those companies not selected are now crying foul. What is more curious, however, is how guarded DISA and DMI are being in discussing the details of the program, given the interest in it and the fact that the usual protest period has now lapsed.
The stakes among the relatively few mobile vendors competing for this award could not be higher. That's because DISA will be the central purchasing, hosting and deployment arm for the Department of Defense and perhaps a proxy for all of U.S. government.
Notionally, DISA will also likely control all subsequent deployments of small-form-factor devices including smartphones, tablets, and special-purpose devices that require management and protection across all branches of the U.S. military.
To the relatively small group of mobile cognoscenti around the beltway, DISA represented a mobility Holy Grail. Winning this award, it was thought, would make or break companies, catapult careers, justify hiring decisions, cement reputations and unmask pretenders to the throne.
DISA's decision could also mean the end for incumbent NOC (Network Operation Center) players such as BlackBerry whose technology is widely regarded as antiquated and whose market share has dwindled to the single digits. Although to be fair, BlackBerry's BB 10 platform is piquing the interest of long-time government BlackBerry customers at a number of sizeable and significant agencies.
More ominously, NOC-dependent Good Technology received a virtual smack down by the DISA deal for similar reasons, including questions concerning scalability, extensibility and performance -- as well as where Good's code is written and hosted. Truth be told, Good has been knocking around the IT world in some form or another since the late 1990's and has been sold several times. Good's technology distinction has been marred by the company's penchant for suing competitors ranging from BlackBerry to Microsoft, Motorola, AirWatch, MobileIron, LRW, and the list goes on and on.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?
Join InformationWeek’s Lorna Garey and Mike Healey, president of Yeoman Technology Group, an engineering and research firm focused on maximizing technology investments, to discuss the right way to go digital.