Mobile
Commentary
10/11/2012
01:36 PM
Kevin Casey
Kevin Casey
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Windows 8: Do I Really Need A Single OS?

If I skip Windows 8, some folks say I'm losing the appealing opportunity to synchronize all of my devices on a single platform. Color me skeptical.

Windows 8 doesn't launch for another couple of weeks, but it seems everyone already has an opinion on it.

That includes me. I recently explained why I'm not planning to upgrade to Windows 8 even though I'm a long-time Windows user. That generated a lot of thoughtful comments, emails, and tweets--thank you for those, and keep them coming.

When I considered the feedback on what I might be missing, one idea in particular jumped out. Am I losing out on a grand opportunity to move everything I do to a single OS? Today, I mix Windows and Android regularly, and there's a Mac in my household, too.

"There's a productivity gap when [users] come into the workplace and have to switch operating systems to work with 'in house' software versus 'mobile' software. Windows 8 bridges that gap. Same device at home as at work. Same software. Same cloud back end. Same identity system," wrote reader "moarsauce123." I received similar comments via email, too.

[ Microsoft anticipates a critical mass of apps soon after release of new OS. See Microsoft: 100,000 Windows 8 Apps Coming. ]

In this scenario, my technology life becomes simpler by virtue of having everything in a single environment--any and every application I use, plus the boatloads of data those apps generate that subsequently need to stored somewhere (and backed up for good measure). In theory, this is more efficient, and everything from security to support to upgrades should improve as a result. Windows 8--with Windows Phone 8 right on its heels--should turn theory into reality.

Comedian Todd Barry tells a joke in this vein: He receives a text message from his wireless provider that he needs to update the software on his Blackberry. He calls tech support; the rep tells him to hook the device up to his computer to install the upgrade.

"Oh, that's cool--I have a Mac," Barry says.

"Oh, you need a PC," the rep replies.

"I have a Mac."

"You need a PC."

"Hold on a second, I want to check something. Yeah--I still have a Mac."

The joke already seems antiquated. I move between Windows, Mac, and Android without much thought, much less actual problems. Is a single OS for all devices really something I need--or is just something Microsoft wants me to think I need? Ecosystem homogeneity has worked very well for Apple, after all. (The cynic might argue that anyone who really cares about OS standardization across devices is already an Apple customer.) Google is making some inroads here with its Chrome and Android family, too. Now Microsoft is catching up. It makes sense in a big-picture kind of way.

There are two related reasons why a uniform OS is probably not going to motivate me to upgrade. The first is money. The all-in scenario requires anyone who currently uses a hybrid approach to buy new hardware. Can you run Windows 8 on your current PCs? Sure, probably. But as Analysys Mason's Patrick Rusby noted in my earlier column, optimization will almost certainly require new hardware investments--be they touch PCs, ultrabooks, tablets, phones, or "transformer" models.

The second reason: Let's say there's a world in which price is not an issue. (What a lovely world, too.) Are we suddenly dumping our iPads, iPhones, and Android devices in the name of OS unification? Color me skeptical.

I do see the logic. There could be advantages in the single OS model. Moreover, I'm a one-man band. A CIO responsible for hundreds or thousands of employees probably has a different take. I asked Steven Peltzman, chief business technology officer at Forrester, to share the view from the executive suite. Peltzman, who previously was CIO for New York's Museum of Modern Art, generally thinks Microsoft is doing the right thing with Windows 8, especially given the significant headway Apple and Google have made in the corporate world. But he can't see OS uniformity--or any single feature, for that matter--driving many IT executives to rush to upgrade.

"It's nice--not thrilling, but nice," Peltzman said in an interview. "It's certainly not going to be the reason to push a ton of people over."

Not exactly a bullet point for the Windows 8 sales team. Neither is the notion that people will suddenly dump their iPads. "Are people really going to do that? Or are companies going to say: 'Don't worry about it, I'll buy you a Windows 8 tablet?' I don't think so," Peltzman said. "It's not something I'll say is never going to happen, but I think that makes it harder."

Blackstone CTO Bill Murphy sees upside in a single platform, but he strikes a more cautious note in terms of execution. "I think the unification is a great concept, and intellectually it makes sense. Having users familiar [with] and used to one paradigm would be better and all applications would run that much more easily," Murphy told me via email. "However, the devil is in the details. If they can truly [optimize the] experiences on each device then it will be a hit. If there is a penalty in usability, adoption will be much more difficult."

Forrester's Peltzman believes the opportunity is indeed there. That aforementioned gap between home and work "is screaming to be closed," he said. Peltzman points to a recent Forrester survey that showed more than half (52%) of people think they have better technology at home than at work; that figure jumps to 60% among younger employees. "Every CIO hears that on a day-to-day basis," Peltzman said.

There's the holy grail: If the hardware and software are the same at home and at work, one can't be "better" than the other. It would help if Microsoft convinced users like me that their platform is so good, we'd be fools to go anywhere else.

Upgrading isn't the easy decision that Win 7 was. We take a close look at Server 2012, changes to mobility and security, and more in the new Here Comes Windows 8 issue of InformationWeek. Also in this issue: Why you should have the difficult conversations about the value of OS and PC upgrades before discussing Windows 8. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
masinick
50%
50%
masinick,
User Rank: Strategist
10/12/2012 | 5:39:02 PM
re: Windows 8: Do I Really Need A Single OS?
Personally, if any single company attempts to lock me into their platform, whether the reason is uniformity, security, ease of use, or whatever the argument, my first thought is to look in another direction.

If, however, that company does their very best to interoperate with as many of the existing systems, applications, and interfaces as possible, while reducing as many dependencies as possible, I may at least consider that approach. If it requires me to buy two or three components, whether hardware or software, I am not inclined to do it unless I already have a need, because of age or capability, in the hardware and software that I already own.

I'm not buying the argument at all.
Verdumont Monte
50%
50%
Verdumont Monte,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/12/2012 | 5:37:28 PM
re: Windows 8: Do I Really Need A Single OS?
Only way I am buying a Win 8 tablet is when they have sufficient number of apps, doesn't have to reboot every day and a considerable amount of battery life. Else I am sticking with my current low cost andriod tablet.
GAProgrammer
50%
50%
GAProgrammer,
User Rank: Strategist
10/12/2012 | 5:21:55 PM
re: Windows 8: Do I Really Need A Single OS?
Mac users do it all the time and rave about it.
droden212
50%
50%
droden212,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/12/2012 | 4:32:56 PM
re: Windows 8: Do I Really Need A Single OS?
Microsoft has been trying since the days of Windows CE to gain a significant foothold in the mobile space. Based on their history, we would be wise to be skeptical about Windows 8 and the forthcoming tablets that will be running it. I realize that things are a little different this time. Windows 8 is the result of a full court press by Microsoft to finally establish itself as a player in mobility. I believe it will turn out be too little, and much too late.

The reason BYOD has become such an important discussion is because users are finally realizing that apps matter and OS's do not. To go even further, I think users are beginning to realize that apps that allow them to work with their data are what's important, regardless of who makes the app. In my own case, my company-issued notebook runs Microsoft Office, but my iPad, Android smartphone and Kindle Fire all run Quickoffice, and I can exchange documents in both directions. Why would I wait for Microsoft's tablet or a someday, maybe version of Microsoft Office on the iPad. As the article suggests, it might be nice, but it's not compelling.

Not only is the genie out of the bottle on this, but I think we are beginning to discover that the bottle, which once served such an important purpose, is now not only unnecessary, but also far too limiting. Policies and procedures that corporations once applied to (and more importantly, through) a standardized OS will now be applied to data and pathways (network traffic). How we get there will be a much more individual choice.

IOS is successful, in part, because Apple did not try to fit the MAC onto a tablet. It started with a clean slate and wrote the OS to fit the medium. Microsoft, in trying to create a one-size-fits-all OS, will once again deliver a product in the mobility space that is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Did you ever used Pocket Word or Pocket IE? The gap between expectations and reality was enormous. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. I believe Microsoft is currently on the fast train to Blackberry-ville. The once mighty will soon find itself without a track.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
InformationWeek Elite 100
InformationWeek Elite 100
Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 27, 2014
Who wins in cloud price wars? Short answer: not IT. Enterprises don't want bare-bones IaaS. Providers must focus on support, not undercutting rivals.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Howard Marks talks about steps to take in choosing the right cloud storage solutions for your IT problems
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.