Verizon's Transfer Of New England Lines Gets A Busy Signal

Officials in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont oppose a plan to hand over older operations to FairPoint Communications.

Verizon Communications' effort to spin off landline operations in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont has run into a roadblock as Vermont regulators turned down Verizon's plan to transfer the operations to FairPoint Communications.

The decision, by the Vermont Public Service Board, was immediately followed up by a move by Maine's Public Utilities Commission to postpone its Wednesday meeting to Jan. 3 to take up the issue. The Maine agency had reached an agreement with Verizon last week and that pact could now be reviewed.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

In a statement, the Vermont board said: "The board found that FairPoint had not demonstrated that it would be financially sound as it seeks to operate the newly acquired territories in Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire -- a service territory that has five times the number of access lines as FairPoint presently has."

In recent months, Verizon has moved to shed landlines and older operations in mostly rural areas as its moves aggressively to deploy advanced wireless and fiber optic services in mostly urban regions.

The Vermont board noted that FairPoint, a North Carolina-based firm with about 310,000 phone lines, would be financially pressed to support the 1.6 million lines that Verizon seeks to shed. The Vermont board noted that FairPoint would have to borrow $2.5 billion to support the transaction.

The Vermont board's decision was hailed by the Communications Workers of America, which has been urging lawmakers to help establish an independent phone company that would be operated by management in the region. The CWA stated that the proposed Verizon-FairPoint deal for Vermont "has the potential to lead to a reduction in service quality, in less investment in the Vermont infrastructure, and to slower deployment of broadband services than is acceptable."

The Vermont board's decision doesn't kill the Verizon-FairPoint deal and New Hampshire and Maine regulators have indicated they are expecting to review revised proposals from the two companies.

FairPoint spokeswoman Rose Cummings told the Associated Press that "this is a procedural move that we consider an invitation to discuss the conditions, to introduce more information into the record... We are looking at it as an invitation to continue discussions around conditions, just a procedural bump."

In its decision, the Vermont board indicated it could approve the transfer of Verizon assets to FairPoint if the financial provisions and some other details can be ironed out.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links