Commentary

Thomas Claburn
 

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie Imagines Post-PC World

In a valedictory memo, Microsoft's departing chief software architect highlights his company's successes and its challenges as cloud services become more important.

Ray Ozzie is relinquishing his role as chief software architect at Microsoft and to mark the occasion he has published a memo outlining the changes that have occurred at the company since he took the reins handed to him by Bill Gates.

It's Ozzie's second public memo about Microsoft's challenges. Titled Dawn of a New Day, it has Apple written all over it, though Apple is not mentioned by name. The first, The Internet Services Disruption, published in October, 2005, outlined a strategy for Microsoft to compete more effectively with the likes of Google.


More Global CIO Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

As Ozzie sees it, Microsoft has largely succeeded in making its transition to cloud-based services. He points to Windows Live as an online complement to the company's Windows and Office software, to Office's transition from the desktop to the Web and mobile devices through Office 365, 2010 Office, SharePoint and Live services. Windows Azure & SQL Azure, he says, is young but a promising foundation for Microsoft's services platform. And he expresses satisfaction with how far Bing and related advertising efforts have come.

Ozzie also lauds Microsoft for its progress in the area of responsible competition, through commitments to allow third parties to access Windows services in the same way that Microsoft can access those services, for example.

Yet, Ozzie acknowledges that Microsoft has not taken advantage of some opportunities and remains behind in some areas. "Certain of our competitors' products and their rapid advancement & refinement of new usage scenarios have been quite noteworthy," he wrote. "Our early and clear vision notwithstanding, their execution has surpassed our own in mobile experiences, in the seamless fusion of hardware & software & services, and in social networking & myriad new forms of Internet-centric social interaction."

Ozzie is speaking mainly of Apple, which seems to have done everything right in terms of the mobile experience and the fusion of hardware, software, and services. He could also be said to be speaking about Google and Android, but the energy behind Android has come more from Google's carrier and handset partners than anything else. Those aspects of Android under Google's control, such as the Nexus One and the Android Market, have had their problems. Google has bankrolled and engineered Android, but it's only a foundation at the moment, not a runaway revenue success story like the iPhone.

Certainly, there's some Google-angst in Ozzie's acknowledgment of the rapid advancement of new usage scenarios. But the swift development of Google Apps and Google's enterprise business hasn't really taken a bite out of Microsoft's bottom line yet. Microsoft's journey with Windows, SharePoint, and Office isn't nearly as steep as the hill it will have to climb with Windows Phone 7.

In addition to his wistful acknowledgment of missed opportunities, Ozzie muses about what the post-PC world will look like. He foresees "cloud-based continuous services that connect us all and do our bidding" and "appliance-like connected devices enabling us to interact with those cloud-based services."

He says today's devices are just the beginning. The gadgets of tomorrow will be "connected companions" that understand where we are and what's going on around us.

"It's the dawn of a new day -- the sun having now arisen on a world of continuous services and connected devices," he concludes.

For Apple and perhaps Google, the time is more like noon.

InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on Oracle's road maps for key Sun products. The report also analyzes what changes the acquisition will bring for business technology decision makers. Download the report here (registration required).

Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links