The case was filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Calif.
In June 2006, Apple acknowledged that an internal investigation had revealed irregularities in its stock option grants between 1997 and 2001. It also said that one of the grants in question was to Jobs but that "it was subsequently canceled and resulted in no financial gain to the CEO."
According to the complaint, Apple's share price dropped 14% in the two weeks after Apple's admission, erasing more than $7 billion in share value. It's this loss that the plaintiffs hope to recover.
In December 2006, Apple said that as a result of its internal investigation, it would restate its financial results to include "an additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $84 million after tax [$105 million pretax], including $4 million and $7 million in fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively." The company said it had found no irregular grants after Dec. 31, 2002.
The 105-page complaint asserts that Jobs and the other Apple executives named in the suit knew what was going on. "The defendants knew that options were not granted on the dates that were disclosed to shareholders and falsified the company's records to create the appearance of illegality, and thus bear direct responsibility for their actions," the complaint states. "Here, Jobs and the Individual Defendants clearly appreciated the fraudulent nature of their conduct."
Jobs, according to the complaint, made an "instant paper profit" of $20,325,000 when, on Dec. 18, 2001, he received 7.5 million Apple shares in a stock option grant dated back to Oct. 19, 2001. And Apple's books did not show a $20,325,000 expense.
The complaint also cites a 10 million-share option grant in January 2000 that, through backdating, resulted in "instant paper profit" of $83,762,000 for Jobs, an amount that at the time was not disclosed to shareholders.
Apple did not respond to a request for comment.
Page 2:
More Legal Challenges Ahead For Apple?
![]()
1
|
2
Next Page »
Open Government: A San Francisco Treat
San Francisco took Obama's pledge of open and transparent government seriously, and launched datasf.org -- its attempt to give the city's data back to its citizens. Developers and users have embraced it, and the city's mayor is already looking ahead....

NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.