The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, reviewed five data-mining efforts employed by the Small Business Administration, Agriculture's Risk Management Agency, the Internal Revenue Service, the State Department, and the FBI.
Most agencies notified the public that they collected and used personal information and provided chances for individuals to review personal information when required by the Privacy Act. But government law and rules require agencies to furnish notice to individual respondents explaining why the information is being collected.
The GAO said only two agencies provided this notice, one did not provide it, and two claimed an allowable exemption from this requirement because the systems were used for law enforcement. The GAO also contends agency compliance with key security requirements was inconsistent. And, it says, three of the five agencies completed privacy impact assessments -- important for analyzing the privacy implications of a system or data collection -- but none of the assessments fully complied with Office of Management and Budget guidance.
"Until agencies fully comply with these requirements," writes Linda Koontz, GAO director of information-management issues, "they lack assurance that individual privacy rights are being appropriately protected."
Open Government: A San Francisco Treat
San Francisco took Obama's pledge of open and transparent government seriously, and launched datasf.org -- its attempt to give the city's data back to its citizens. Developers and users have embraced it, and the city's mayor is already looking ahead....

NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.