GSA Pilots Procurement Wiki

The General Services Administration's BetterBuy project allows vendors to provide online feedback on the RFP process.

The General Services Administration (GSA) is testing a collaborative approach to procurement for two projects as a way to streamline the process for bidding vendors.

Through a pilot Web site called BetterBuy, the GSA is providing a wiki through which vendors may provide feedback on acquisitions and suggest ways to improve the process, according to blog post by Mary Davie, assistant commissioner for the Office of Assisted Acquisition Services in the GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Davie leads the project.


More Government Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

One project is for improving Data.gov's data storage and hosting capabilities and the other is for an unspecified project called "Clearpath," on which the government seeks technical infrastructure. The GSA will launch Clearpath in a few weeks, according to the post.

"By engaging in dialogue with the acquisition community and the public, we can tap into our best source of innovation and fresh ideas," Martha N. Johnson, Administrator of General Services, said in a statement.

She said BetterBuy is in line with President Obama's call for the government to use technology to be more transparent and help people do business more easily with government agencies.

The government acquisition process is currently time-consuming and inefficient for vendors and does not allow for interaction. The GSA hopes to streamline the process through the pilot wiki program.

As the procurement process works now, the government posts a document online listing requirements for an acquisition, and individual vendors respond with questions about it, often the same ones.

This process of figuring out exactly what the government is looking for, as well as exactly what vendors are offering in their proposals, is not currently a very interactive one, and is costly for vendors preparing bids.

The GSA hopes that by using social-networking technologies, vendors will work better together to understand what the government's requirement are, lower their bid-preparation costs, and make the process generally more efficient. It also should help the government better understand what vendors are offering in their RFPs.

The GSA teamed up with the National Academy of Public Administration and the American Council for Technology-Industry Advisory Council to create the BetterBuy project.

Whether government agencies are assessing internal clouds, public cloud services, or private-public hybrid cloud environments, this report shows where open source may fit into those plans. Download it now (registration required).

Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links