In the suit filed in U.S. federal district court, AMD identifies 38 companies that it says have been "victims" of coercion by Intel. AMD maintains that Intel has forced major customers such as Dell, Gateway, Hitachi, Sony, and Toshiba into Intel-exclusive deals in return for cash payments, discriminatory pricing, or marketing subsidies that are based on agreement not to use any AMD products.
A spokesman for Intel said on Tuesday morning, "We haven't seen the lawsuit, so we can't provide specific comment, but we believe our sales practices are both fair and consistent with all antitrust laws."
AMD claims that Intel paid Sony millions of dollars for exclusivity, resulting in AMD's share of Sony's business dropping from a high of 23% in 2002 to zero in 2003, where it remains today.
Other major customers such as Acer, Fujitsu, and NEC were "forced" into partially exclusive agreements, the suit said, by conditioning rebates, allowances, and market-development funds on severely limiting purchases from AMD, including paying NEC several million dollars to ensure that Intel has at least 90% of NEC's business.
Intel's illegal practices also extend to retailers, AMD claims. Intel has established and enforced quotas at key retailers such as Best Buy and Circuit City, requiring them to stock overwhelmingly or exclusively Intel-based computers.
AMD and Intel have battled in the courtroom numerous times over the past three decades.
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.