Opteron's two biggest markets will be databases and high-performance computing apps, says Marty Seyer, VP and general manager of AMD's microprocessor business unit. AMD doesn't have a strong track record in the server market, Seyer acknowledges, but its approach of supporting both 32-bit and 64-bit apps should help the vendor attract companies ready to begin their 64-bit migrations before converting all of their apps to 64-bit.
Windows Server 2003 won't open new markets for AMD, says George Condon, executive VP of Avnet's AMD business unit, because the Opteron chip was designed for clustered computing environments, most of which prefer Linux. Indeed, SuSE Linux this week will introduce a version of its Linux Enterprise Server operating system, priced at $448, that runs on Opteron servers.
Texas A&M University expects to have a high-performance computing cluster by the end of this month using 128 dual-processor Opteron servers running SuSE Linux that support 384 Gbytes of RAM. Texas A&M's College of Science will use the cluster to solve computational problems as well as run bioinformatics and physics apps. The university has clustered 32-bit AMD Athlon servers and wants to take advantage of the additional memory addressability that 64-bit computing provides. "At a university, price-performance is a major factor in our computing purchases," says Steven Johnson, senior systems analyst with Texas A&M's mathematics department. "The biggest benefit of Intel and AMD getting into the 64-bit market is to drive costs down."
AMD has a lot riding on Opteron's success. Last week, the company reported a 21% dip in sales for its first quarter, ended March 30. AMD reported a loss of $146.4 million for the quarter, on sales of $714.6 million, compared with a loss of $9.2 million on sales of $902 million for the first quarter of last year.
Opteron is in line with where the server market is going, says Nathan Brookwood, principal analyst for Insight 64. "Over the remainder of this decade, we'll see a substantial shift from processors based upon proprietary architectures to industry-standard processors from Intel and AMD." Itanium targets the high end of the server market, those that run more than 16 processors and cost between $25,000 and $1 million, he says, while AMD targets two-way and four-way servers that generally sell for less than $10,000. Says Brookwood, "Intel and AMD will rarely compete within the next few years, at least until Intel grows down and AMD grows up."
Stay connected and informed by visiting the CA Solutions Center Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.