Health Insurance Exchanges Change Game

Healthcare reform forces insurers to modernize their IT infrastructure and business processes, says health IT exec.


Slideshow: Disney Cancer CenterO ffers High Tech Care
(click for larger image and for full slideshow)
With new rules requiring that large-group health insurers limit spending on administrative functions to no more than 15% of premium revenue--20% for individual and small-group plans--payers have a stark choice: raise their premiums or become more efficient. Successful insurance companies will choose the latter path by fundamentally rethinking how they attract new members and process claims, according to one technology vendor.

Health plans at their core are transaction processors, noted Dan Spirek, chief strategy and marketing officer of the TriZetto Group, a Greenwood Village, Colo.-based vendor of payer-side healthcare management software. "They've spent the last few years incrementally improving [on] the status quo," Spirek said in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare. But with health reform, greater provider adoption of electronic health records, and the transition to ANSI X-12 version 5010 transactions and ICD-10 code sets, they have to accelerate their efforts.


More Healthcare Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

"It's almost like Y2K in that they have to look at their entire IT infrastructure," Spirek said.

TriZetto is among the companies mentioned in a recent IDC report, "Business Strategy: Care is the New Core--Healthcare Payer Top 10 for Health Management in the Reform Decade." That document said that healthcare reform, competition for new customers, and a need to cut operating expenses would drive health insurers to change their business models in the coming years.

[Which healthcare organizations came out ahead in the InformationWeek 500 competition? See 10 Healthcare IT Innovators: InformationWeek 500.]

"It's not really a new imperative, but it becomes a doubly important imperative," Spirek said. Raising premiums is less of an option than it used to be because the market will become more competitive between now and 2014, when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [PPACA] fully phases in health insurance exchanges. Already, Spirek said, there has been a migration toward Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care, which are more consumer-oriented than employer-based insurance, in that members choose the insurance carrier.

There is more of a sense of urgency with the coming advent of health insurance exchanges, since participants likely will buy on cost and because there will be new methods of marketing and distributing health insurance, mostly enabled by technology. "If you're not ready, you could have your lunch eaten," Spirek said.

"The basic realization is that you can't spend your way out of reform," Spirek explained. "You've got to attack the cost of care or you're not going to be in the game."

According to Spirek, payers have three levels of IT systems: core administrative (enrolling, paying claims, customer service); care management and population management; and connecting constituents to information. When the PPACA passed in early 2010, TriZetto surveyed its customers. Insurers that had invested in new technology across those categories were three times more profitable than those that had not, and their medical-loss ratios were better, Spirek said. "The more they invested in technology, the better they did," he added.

Spirek said the trend now is toward outsourcing, something that payers historically have avoided, in part because the largest insurers have tended to be rather tight with state officials who saw them as job creators. "There was no burning platform," Spirek said. Now, the 15% and 20% requirements have changed that.

Find out how health IT leaders are dealing with the industry's pain points, from allowing unfettered patient data access to sharing electronic records. Also in the new, all-digital issue of InformationWeek Healthcare: There needs to be better e-communication between technologists and clinicians. Download the issue now. (Free registration required.)


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links