Patients Have Security Concerns On Data Sharing

New report by PwC reveals what consumers think about data sharing, privacy and security, online consultations, social media in healthcare, and more.

Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
Consumers are concerned about the privacy and security of their health data, but most are comfortable having their health information shared among healthcare providers if doing so would improve their care, according to a new report.

In a recent PwC Health Research Institute online survey of 1,000 consumers, when asked to select the purposes for which they would be comfortable having their health data shared among healthcare organizations, 60% said for improving coordination of their care; 54% said for supporting real-time decisions in their care; 36% said to support analysis of doctors' performance; and 29% said to provide data to identify groups or patients at risk for health issues.


More Healthcare Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

While consumers are warming up to the idea of having their medical data shared among healthcare providers, that doesn't mean consumers aren't concerned about the privacy and security of that data.

In fact, 30% of consumers said that if cost, quality, and access were equal among choices, they'd be swayed to select one hospital over another if one had clearer privacy and security policies.

[A data security issue that healthcare organizations often overlook is employees accidentally granting access to the network. See P2P Networks Expose Healthcare Data to Identify Theft.]

Besides security and privacy, among the other considerations some consumers said they'd weigh in choosing a healthcare provider included the ability to consult online with doctors (28%) and if a facility used e-health records (17%). Only 5% said they'd pick a hospital because it had a social media presence, such as having a blog, or using Twitter, FaceBook, or YouTube to engage patients.

Other health IT-related matters are woven into many of what likely will be next year's top health industry issues, according to the report by PwC Health Research Institute, a research and advisory unit of PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLC.

For instance, IT will play an integral role in the various new alliances emerging between healthcare providers and payers that are focused on population-health-oriented reimbursement plans, such as accountable care organizations, shared savings models, and bundled payment models. Data integration and the ability to share data will be crucial for these efforts, said the PwC report.

Also, the report suggests that "organizations, regardless of plans for integration or partnering, should evaluate a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/security-privacy/231903007">data mining, informatics, and data-sharing capabilities as the need for effective population health continues to grow."

Finally, drug shortages likely will worsen in 2012, affecting patients, providers, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and researchers alike, predicts PwC. The FDA reported 178 separate incidents of drug shortages in 2010, and the shortages are expected to increase into 2012.

"Real-time drug inventory systems can help manufacturers anticipate patient demand and minimize reliance on gray market vendors," said the report. "Drug manufacturers with strong governance and communication policies will be able to respond quickly and aggressively when shortages do occur."

The new InformationWeek Healthcare supplement explains how the most astute healthcare providers are putting those billions of dollars in federal stimulus funds to productive use. Download the supplement now. (Free registration required.)


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links