The issue involves charges that the Qualcomm attorneys improperly withheld thousands of pages of e-mails and documents in litigation with Broadcom. Qualcomm filed the initial lawsuit against Broadcom in 2005, charging that the competitor had violated Qualcomm video compression patents.
The judge ordered Qualcomm to review its practices and report back to her on its progress later this month. Another 13 lawyers representing Qualcomm were exonerated by Major.
In her ruling, the judge stated: "Producing 1.2 million pages of marginally relevant documents while hiding 46,000 critically important ones does not constitute good faith and does not satisfy either the client's or attorney's discovery obligations."
The issue revolved around whether Qualcomm had disclosed the patents at issue to a standards committee. The judge said Qualcomm had withheld the documents in an attempt to win the case.
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.