The bank did not disclose when the breach occurred. Once alerted to the breach, the company "began enhanced monitoring of the affected accounts for fraud" and in mid-February detected several hundred fraudulent cash withdrawals in the three countries, the company said in a statement. Citibank proceeded to block all transactions in those countries that rely on PIN authentication.
Citibank wouldn't name the third-party business whose systems were breached. The bank also didn't specify how or when its affected customers were notified that they could no longer make PIN-based transactions. Some Citibank customers have used blogs to relate their experiences dealing with the bank. One Canadian, through a blog entry dated March 5th, noted that he found out about the problem after an ATM transaction was denied, rather than through official notification from his bank.
This isn't Citigroup's first brush with data insecurity. In June, the bank revealed that a box of unencrypted tapes containing information on 3.9 million customers was lost in transit. Citigroup shipped the box May 2nd via UPS Inc., but it never arrived at its destination, an Experian credit bureau in Texas. The tapes contained names, Social Security numbers, account numbers, and payment histories of CitiFinancial customers.
Citigroup is by no means alone in its inability to protect customer data. In fact, the list is extensive and growing. Ameriprise Financial in January revealed that unencrypted data, including Social Security numbers of 226,000 customers and employees, was stolen from a laptop. Some H&R Block customers rang in the New Year by finding out that their Social Security numbers were included in the tracking number used to mail them packages containing the company's TaxCut software. Kaiser Permanente last year was fined $200,000 for a data breach that affected 150 customers.
These highly publicized embarrassments are beginning to have some affect on how companies handle customer data. In February, Citigroup, Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Co., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., U.S. Bancorp, and Wells Fargo & Co., plus major auditors and service providers, released a common methodology that financial services companies could use to assess service provider security. BITS, a consortium backed by the financial services industry, developed the methodology after studying service providers including Acxiom, First Data, IBM, Viewpointe Archive Services, and Yodlee. The goal is to give service providers consistent demands and make them live up to them. Banks are cooperating because they know the alternative: fines, lawsuits, and a tarnished image that can't be easily fixed.
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.