Policy processing, as with previously tested products, runs users through multiple passes of the policy as their statuses change. LANsight ships with a number of predefined policy templates for common activities, such as allowing authentication to unknown hosts or redirecting to a Web portal page. LANsight can detect and act on a very limited set of applications; broader app support, as well as the ability to define allowed or denied functions and methods within applications, would be useful. User groups can be mapped to group names in Windows Active Directory.
Policies use a hierarchal model, similar to that in ConSentry's LANShield, and so may be reused. Nevis attempts to clean up policy windows by presenting inbound and outbound access controls that have been defined for a given policy, as well as an effective policy list showing all entries from inherited policies. Bear in mind, however, that while that's efficient in terms of policy reuse, we found it can create unintended consequences, and conflicts are all too easy to set up.
Host assessments in NAC run the gamut from a simple check for antivirus software to in-depth configuration analysis that duplicates work already done by other management tools, like desktop configuration and patch management systems. Nevis' CEI agent, which performs host assessment, is an ActiveX component that may be installed dynamically using Internet Explorer or via an MSI. Unlike most persistent agents, CEI needs to be launched through the browser or a login script, which means additional work for users or administrators. Nevis should clean up the persistent installation process to make it more streamlined.
CEI policies are global for LANsight with no way to define diverse requirements for different hosts. At best, you can enable or disable CEI scanning on a per-interface basis. Antivirus and anti-spyware inspections are also limited to checking for last update and system scan.
Once a host is on the network, it must be monitored, and that's where Nevis' Threat Control comes in, using a variety of techniques to detect malicious activity: network anomaly detection, protocol anomaly detection, and signatures to detect bad behavior associated with known malware, adware, or other potentially undesirable traffic. Anomaly settings can be tuned to reflect local network conditions, and signatures may be enabled or disabled.
Threat Control works on a simple scoring mechanism. "Good" actions, like a completed TCP connection, lower the score, while "bad" activity, such as network scanning, increases the score. If a host's score crosses a set threshold, the host may be notified through CEI messaging, quarantined, or blocked. We recommend setting traffic detection to alert-only during initial deployment and monitoring network activity for an average score before you set the system to block or quarantine.
CLAIM: In-line NAC products are superior to out-of-band systems because they can monitor and filter all traffic passing through the appliance and require no network changes other than re-cabling. Network visibility also means in-line products can act on malicious traffic such as worms and DoS attacks.
CONTEXT: The best NAC deployment style is based on two principles: When does an assessment occur, and how is access control enforced? Out-of-band NAC tends to place hosts onto networks based on host condition, while in-band NAC generally restricts access based on a wide variety of criteria.
CREDIBILITY: Nevis' products are quite polished, although some advanced features, including application access control support and deep host assessment, aren't on par with competitors. However, Nevis' management station is both informative and simple to use, two must-haves for smooth ongoing management. Its agent-based login tracking closes a big hole with in-line NAC, but agent functions could be improved.
However, CEI requires scripting to auto-install and run at system startup, and policy options aren't as flexible as those in Vernier Networks' product. Nor are assessment policies tied to users or groups.

![]()
![]()
NLANenforcer 2024 supports 1,000 users![]()
FEATURED PRODUCT:
LANenforcer 2024, $34,995 for 1,000 users; LANsight One Security Management Appliance, $9,500; Client Endpoint Integrity included.
ABOUT THIS ROLLING REVIEW:
We tested in-line NAC products using a basic access control policy on an existing network. We focused on policy development, enforcement features, host assessment, logging, and troubleshooting.
ALREADY TESTED:
• ConSentry Networks
• Vernier Networks
NEXT UP:
Wrap-up
OTHER VENDORS INVITED:
Enterasys, Juniper Networks, and Nortel Networks
Page 2:
Watch This
![]()
1
|
2
Next Page »
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.