Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

  • Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share
  • icon

In-line NAC Rolling Review: Nevis Networks


LANenforcer is at the head of the class in this Rolling Review thus far, though it does have room for improvement.



THE UPSHOT
CLAIM: In-line NAC products are superior to out-of-band systems because they can monitor and filter all traffic passing through the appliance and require no network changes other than re-cabling. Network visibility also means in-line products can act on malicious traffic such as worms and DoS attacks.

CONTEXT: The best NAC deployment style is based on two principles: When does an assessment occur, and how is access control enforced? Out-of-band NAC tends to place hosts onto networks based on host condition, while in-band NAC generally restricts access based on a wide variety of criteria.

CREDIBILITY: Nevis' products are quite polished, although some advanced features, including application access control support and deep host assessment, aren't on par with competitors. However, Nevis' management station is both informative and simple to use, two must-haves for smooth ongoing management. Its agent-based login tracking closes a big hole with in-line NAC, but agent functions could be improved.
Nevis Networks' LAN enforcer is the most polished in-line network access control, or NAC, product we've tested in this Rolling Review, though there are still a few smudges for Nevis to address. On the plus side, the monitoring and troubleshooting tools in the LANsight One management platform are far and away the most complete and useful we've seen thus far. And Nevis' endpoint assessment agent, dubbed Clientless Endpoint Integrity, or CEI, offers such unique features as login tracking and messaging.

LANenforcer 2024

NLANenforcer 2024 supports 1,000 users
However, CEI requires scripting to auto-install and run at system startup, and policy options aren't as flexible as those in Vernier Networks' product. Nor are assessment policies tied to users or groups.

Nevis gave us a few interesting decisions in terms of installing LANenforcer and LANsight. The appliances may be managed in-band--meaning management traffic between LANsight and the LANenforcer mingles with log and network traffic--or out of band, where management, log, and network traffic can be separated. Nevis recommends out-of-band management, and that makes sense to us. If LANsight appliances are purchased in pairs and deployed in an active/passive configuration, system state is kept current. In the event of failure, the passive system picks up duties, and a default policy for new users may be defined on LANenforcers.

Policy processing, as with previously tested products, runs users through multiple passes of the policy as their statuses change. LANsight ships with a number of predefined policy templates for common activities, such as allowing authentication to unknown hosts or redirecting to a Web portal page. LANsight can detect and act on a very limited set of applications; broader app support, as well as the ability to define allowed or denied functions and methods within applications, would be useful. User groups can be mapped to group names in Windows Active Directory.

Policies use a hierarchal model, similar to that in ConSentry's LANShield, and so may be reused. Nevis attempts to clean up policy windows by presenting inbound and outbound access controls that have been defined for a given policy, as well as an effective policy list showing all entries from inherited policies. Bear in mind, however, that while that's efficient in terms of policy reuse, we found it can create unintended consequences, and conflicts are all too easy to set up.

IN DETAIL
FEATURED PRODUCT:
LANenforcer 2024, $34,995 for 1,000 users; LANsight One Security Management Appliance, $9,500; Client Endpoint Integrity included.

ABOUT THIS ROLLING REVIEW:
We tested in-line NAC products using a basic access control policy on an existing network. We focused on policy development, enforcement features, host assessment, logging, and troubleshooting.

ALREADY TESTED:
ConSentry Networks
Vernier Networks

NEXT UP:
Wrap-up

OTHER VENDORS INVITED:
Enterasys, Juniper Networks, and Nortel Networks
Like other in-line NAC products, LANenforcer can't passively detect user logoffs. Nevis resolves that issue by using a host agent that maintains a heartbeat. When the heartbeat disappears, the user associated with a host is considered logged off. We found that logoffs were noted quickly and open ports closed promptly.

Host assessments in NAC run the gamut from a simple check for antivirus software to in-depth configuration analysis that duplicates work already done by other management tools, like desktop configuration and patch management systems. Nevis' CEI agent, which performs host assessment, is an ActiveX component that may be installed dynamically using Internet Explorer or via an MSI. Unlike most persistent agents, CEI needs to be launched through the browser or a login script, which means additional work for users or administrators. Nevis should clean up the persistent installation process to make it more streamlined.

CEI policies are global for LANsight with no way to define diverse requirements for different hosts. At best, you can enable or disable CEI scanning on a per-interface basis. Antivirus and anti-spyware inspections are also limited to checking for last update and system scan.

Once a host is on the network, it must be monitored, and that's where Nevis' Threat Control comes in, using a variety of techniques to detect malicious activity: network anomaly detection, protocol anomaly detection, and signatures to detect bad behavior associated with known malware, adware, or other potentially undesirable traffic. Anomaly settings can be tuned to reflect local network conditions, and signatures may be enabled or disabled.

Threat Control works on a simple scoring mechanism. "Good" actions, like a completed TCP connection, lower the score, while "bad" activity, such as network scanning, increases the score. If a host's score crosses a set threshold, the host may be notified through CEI messaging, quarantined, or blocked. We recommend setting traffic detection to alert-only during initial deployment and monitoring network activity for an average score before you set the system to block or quarantine.


Page 2:  Watch This
1 | 2 Next Page »


Subscribe to RSS


Advertisement






Get InformationWeek in Print

Apply for a free 52-week subscription to InformationWeek (a $199 value)



NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.