In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge John C. Coughenour went beyond determining whether Lindows' lawyers had argued sufficiently that the company hadn't violated trademark, saying that Microsoft had, in fact, raised "serious questions" about the merits of its own case. The wording of the ruling indicates that Microsoft may actually emerge from a trial with reduced trademark muscle because of its decision to originally name its Windows product line after a generic computing term. "Although Lindows certainly made a conscious decision to play with fire by choosing a product and company name that differs by only one letter from the world's leading computer software program, one could just as easily conclude that in 1983 Microsoft made an equally risky decision," wrote the judge.
Not surprisingly, Microsoft was less than pleased with the ruling and intends to prove that it holds a valid trademark in court. "We will defend the years of hard work that went into building it into a trusted name among consumers," Microsoft a spokesman says. Judge Coughenour is slated to preside over the trial. Lindows, meanwhile, has released a sneak preview of LindowsOS and is planning to reveal general availability later this year.
Boeing seeking Software Engineer 5 in Anaheim, CA
KForce seeking Inside Sales Associate in San Diego, CA
Amalgamated Bank seeking Chief Information Officer in New York, NY
Apollo College seeking Medical Billing and Coding Instructors in Albuquerque, NM
Allstate seeking Exlusive Agent in Las Vegas, NV
For more great jobs, career-related news, features and services, please visit our Career Center.
10 Steps For Stronger Application Performance
Subpar application performance has an impact-on employee productivity, perception of IT, and the expectations customers and partners have about your organization's overall ability to deliver. We can - and must - do better. Here's how.
read more 
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.