In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge John C. Coughenour went beyond determining whether Lindows' lawyers had argued sufficiently that the company hadn't violated trademark, saying that Microsoft had, in fact, raised "serious questions" about the merits of its own case. The wording of the ruling indicates that Microsoft may actually emerge from a trial with reduced trademark muscle because of its decision to originally name its Windows product line after a generic computing term. "Although Lindows certainly made a conscious decision to play with fire by choosing a product and company name that differs by only one letter from the world's leading computer software program, one could just as easily conclude that in 1983 Microsoft made an equally risky decision," wrote the judge.
Not surprisingly, Microsoft was less than pleased with the ruling and intends to prove that it holds a valid trademark in court. "We will defend the years of hard work that went into building it into a trusted name among consumers," Microsoft a spokesman says. Judge Coughenour is slated to preside over the trial. Lindows, meanwhile, has released a sneak preview of LindowsOS and is planning to reveal general availability later this year.
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.