Rolling Review: VMware Shows Agility In View 3
Server virtualization stalwart shows it has desktop chops, too.To get our virtual desktop infrastructure rolling review started, we took VMware's View 3 (follow-up to VDI Version 2.1) for a spin in our Boston labs. If you're not quite getting what you expected out of your terminal services environment, View 3 might cure what ails you.
Ask Citrix or Microsoft Terminal Services administrators what their biggest pain points are, and the most common answer will be issues related to application deployment/compatibility, printing, and session management. Some admins even have to mix in some application virtualization via Microsoft SoftGrid in order to keep those legacy applications humming along. And what if one of your Citrix users needs to install a custom application? Better hope that custom app doesn't take down the Citrix server.
More Storage Insights
Webcasts
- Best Practices in SMB Desktop Virtualization
- CTO to CTO: Scott Davies, VMware, and Jim Davies, Mitel, Give Voice to the Virtual Desktop
White Papers
- IBM PowerVM Virtualization Technology on IBM POWER7 Systems
- How to Prepare Your Virtualized Data Center for the Cloud
Reports
More >>Forward-thinking IT managers are increasingly turning to virtualized desktops. If your user needs to install a custom app, no problem: The virtual desktop acts just like a fat client computer. If your user blows up his virtual desktop with spyware, just blow up the VM and re-create it instantly with a virtual template. Although terminal services is still the best solution for serving individual apps in a WAN-friendly way, VDI is quickly becoming the best solution for IT shops unhappy with the limitations of a full Citrix or Microsoft Terminal Services desktop session
VDI And The Law
Our real-world scenario centers on a fictional legal startup called Bits & Bytes Legal Services LLC that's building a VDI-based desktop computing environment from scratch. B&B's decision to implement VDI was driven by several factors, the most important of which was security. The centralization of the operating system, along with all critical business data, ensures that damage is minimized in the event of a thin client or laptop theft.
In addition, B&B wants to ensure users can customize their desktop computing environment as though it were a full client. Finally, B&B wants the ability to convert VMware's VMDK (Virtual Machine Disk Format) file format to store virtual desktop templates to Symantec Ghost images. That way, the VDI environment can act like a master desktop image repository, where fat client images can be deployed ad hoc if need be.
B&B employs 100 attorneys and paralegals, with 25 workers in its Boston headquarters, and 75 distributed among spoke sites in Silicon Valley, Dallas, and Washington, D.C. The Silicon Valley office is connected to the Boston HQ with two bonded T1s (two T1s together to obtain an aggregate bandwidth of 3 Mbps), the Washington office connects via a single T1, and the Dallas office is connected with a 1.5-Mbps-down, 512-Kbps-up DSL circuit, and network latency could potentially impact quality of service. Before plowing ahead with an investment in VDI, B&B must determine how the WAN would affect its ability to serve out virtual desktops at an acceptable performance level.
THE UPSHOT |
|
CLAIM:
VMware View 3 aims to extend its already dominant position in server virtualization technology to the desktop virtualization realm. VMware, like other desktop virtualization players, is well positioned to solve the application compatibility and user customization problems that typically plague terminal services solutions. CONTEXT: VMware still holds the lead in the hypervisor space, and that lead is even more evident on the desktop virtualization side. With the recent release of View 3, the company has addressed several of the shortcomings of VDI 2.1, such as storage optimization and improved offline virtual desktop access. CREDIBILITY: VMware View provides a mature back-end foundation for deploying VDI on a grand scale. Larger enterprises will need to partner with a leading connection broker vendor in order to obtain the load balancing, compression, and performance typically required in those environments. However, with View 3.0, VMware is attempting to up the ante and is indirectly putting the squeeze on connection broker vendors with some of its overlapping functionality. |
The implementation may sound daunting, but it was extremely simple to deploy. ESX Server installation is fully automated, and the VDM connection broker software installed in minutes on our front-end Windows 2003 Server build. The only major installation decision to make was whether or not the front-end VDM would serve in standalone or redundant capacity. After building our VMs within VirtualCenter, the last step included logging in to the Web-enabled VDM management GUI, applying our evaluation license, and adding the virtual desktops we wanted to serve out to clients.
Through the VDM manager, administrators can tie individual virtual desktops to a specific user through his or her Active Directory user account credentials credentials. A pool of virtual desktops can be provisioned to a group of employees, in persistent or nonpersistent mode. In nonpersistent mode, all customizations to the virtual desktop are lost when the virtual desktop is closed. In persistent mode, all state information is saved when the virtual desktop is shut down. Clients can access their virtual desktops via single sign-on through the VDM client software, or via a browser based Web client.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
Related Webcasts
- SMB Server Guide: Meeting Email, Virtualization, and Business Application Challenges
- The Dell Difference: Lessons from Dell’s Own IT Transformation
- Best Practices in SMB Desktop Virtualization
- CTO to CTO: Scott Davies, VMware, and Jim Davies, Mitel, Give Voice to the Virtual Desktop
- Forrester Total Economic Impact study of Midrange Storage
This Week's Issue
Free Print Subscription
SubscribeCurrent Healthcare Issue
- InformationWeek Healthcare CIO 25: Our second annual honor roll of the health IT leaders driving healthcare's transformation.
- EHR Unreadiness: Only a small percentage of physicians planning to apply for Meaningful Use funds have e-health record systems capable of achieving most of the requirements. .
- And much more!
- Read the Current Issue
Related Whitepapers
Featured Resource
"Read this white paper to learn about the security issues you need to consider and how IBM assessment services and guidelines for securing cloud implementations can help you maximize the business value of cloud investments while minimizing risk.
Read Now













Comments: