But that's a poor excuse for a strategy. For one, file servers and NAS appliances can only serve the clients and applications attached to them. This can lead to unbalanced storage utilization. Workgroup A's appliance may be near to bursting while workgroup B's sits half empty. Reconfiguring workgroup A's clients to tap into workgroup B's storage device is often more trouble than simply adding another device. For another, the sticker price on a storage appliance isn't a full measure of its overall cost. The proliferation of low-cost storage devices can increase costs elsewhere, such as management and power and cooling.
Enter file virtualization. This technology inserts itself--whether logically or physically--between clients and applications and storage devices. Clients and applications are configured to connect to the virtualization layer, which appears to the clients as one giant storage system known as the global namespace. The virtualization system then manages the actual connections to the storage devices.
By creating a global namespace, several things become possible. First, storage devices can be used by any client or application, which enables storage administrators to make better use of available capacity and to easily distribute new capacity. Second, the file virtualization layer simplifies common tasks such as migration and mirroring. Some file virtualization technologies let administrators move data even while users are making changes to the files. Third, administrators can get better control over data disposition, such as moving lower-value data to a less expensive disk.
File virtualization has yet to make significant inroads to the enterprise. A rough estimate from the Taneja Group, a storage consulting firm, puts total current revenue from file virtualization products at just $100 million. But analysts expect those revenue numbers to soar. That's because file virtualization provides immediate relief from a chronic IT pain: data migration.
Enterprises also migrate data to reclaim unused storage. "We found a lot of our projects had space allocated to them that wasn't being used, like 30% to 35%," says John James, officer in charge for the U.S. IT unit of SPi, a global business process outsourcing provider. That unused storage was essentially wasted money, he says.
So James copied information to tape, deleted it off the original system, and then restored it to another location. But there's always a risk that this process could've been interrupted by a business opportunity that required users to get access to the data. "We'd have to stop and allow production to do their thing, and then restart again," says James.
Indeed, migrating data is like trying to move office furniture--you can only do it when your employees aren't using it. That means storage administrators have to set up a time with business units in which the data becomes unavailable to workers, such as a weekend.
![]()

![]()
(click image for larger view)
Page 2:
Move The Right Data
![]()
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
Next Page »
Stay connected and informed by visiting our Enterprise IT Community!

Become a member today for instant access to free InformationWeek research, expert advice, peer perspectives, and more on the following topics:
- Application Performance Management (APM)
- Security Management
- Mainframe 2.0
- IT Automation
- Service Assurance
Also, visit our Government, Retail and Financial Services groups to see how these technologies apply specifically to those industries.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.