In fact, if you employ the sensible precautions outlined above, the EULA doesn't materially change anything, and thus isn't something I think we need to lie awake at night worrying about.
What's your take? Is Fred too sanguine about the new EULA terms? Do you agree that the three steps he outlines can provide enough protection against covert phone-home behavior? Or do you think the new EULA does indeed grant Microsoft the right to override your update settings or to take control of your PC, flushing out software it doesn't like? Do you see the new EULA as a threat? Join in the discussion!
To discuss this column with other readers, please visit Fred Langa's forum on the Listening Post.
To find out more about Fred Langa, please visit his page on the Listening Post.
Despite the somewhat hysterical coverage in The Register and elsewhere, I don't think the new EULA represents a significant threat to your privacy or security. It certainly doesn't mean that Bill Gates or his minions are going to log into your system with "admin rights" and start changing things against your will; nor does it mean that Microsoft software will override your "no auto-update" settings or somehow get around your anti-phone-home firewall protection.
« Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3
Achieving Successful Coexistence Between Notes and Microsoft Platforms
Learn about the key migration and coexistence challenges youżll face when considering migration from IBM Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange and Microsoft SharePoint Server. Get best practices for planning and executing a successful coexistence strategy, and discover how you can ensure seamless coexistence between the Lotus and Microsoft environments.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.