The answer is simple: a little common sense goes a long way. I always check the privacy policy pages of a site that asks for personal data. If the site lacks a privacy policy, or if the policy states, "personally-identifiable information may be shared with business partners," then the warning bells start to go off, and I proceed with extreme caution, if at all.
But if a site is being overly invasive by asking for information beyond what's reasonable, I'll either bail out and move to another site, or provide the site with only the information I feel they need to know. For example, if I'm ordering something from an online store, then I'll freely provide my name, credit card, phone number, and shipping address. But I'll skip any irrelevant demographic questions, and if I encounter a "this field must not be left blank" message involving personal data unrelated to fulfilling the order, I'll reward the site's invasiveness by taking my business elsewhere.
What If Sites Collude To Share Data Behind Your Back?
That sounds horrible--but is it? The answer is in your pile of snail mail: We all know from our mounds of junk paper mail that many companies already share some customer data. If you buy a widget from catalog company A, you may soon get widget catalogs from companies B, C, D... because company A sold your address as a widget "prospect" to other sellers.
Many Web sites do the same thing. On an order or sign-up page, you'll often see a check box that says something to the effect of "I want to learn of other exciting offers." If you answer affirmatively, then your address can be sold or traded to other companies. But this can be done quite openly and legally; no secret Web bugging is needed.
If you decline the offer for additional information, and if the site's privacy policy specifically states that your personal information will be not sold, traded, or given out without your consent, than you should not be spammed. That privacy policy is a form of contract between the Web site and you, and the site must adhere to its policy or face legal repercussions.
In this regard, most reputable Web sites--which are the only ones with whom you should share sensitive personal information--are actually better about protecting your information than some paper-catalog companies. Thus, this part of the Web-bug fear fantasy mostly evaporates when you look at it closely.
Some sites that use bugs (and cookies) do require that you enter personal data. What then?
A big part of the Web-bug fear fantasy is that once a site has somehow obtained sensitive personal information from you, it will share that info with another site.
Page 4:
![]()
« Previous Page
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
Next Page »
Achieving Successful Coexistence Between Notes and Microsoft Platforms
Learn about the key migration and coexistence challenges youżll face when considering migration from IBM Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange and Microsoft SharePoint Server. Get best practices for planning and executing a successful coexistence strategy, and discover how you can ensure seamless coexistence between the Lotus and Microsoft environments.
NOTE: Offer valid for U.S., U.S. possessions, & Canada only.