But help is on the way in the form of The New Age Of Innovation (McGraw-Hill, 2008), a seminal new book from C.K. Prahalad and M.S. Krishnan. The book is being published this month in India and will debut in the United States next month.
The book is about the convergence of global networks and customer-focused strategies, and the profound impact that's having on modern business models. The authors explain that business value must be "co-created" with each customer individually, which they refer to with the formula N = 1. Also, companies must learn to leverage the global supply chain to access resources necessary to continuously innovate products and services, which the authors refer to as R = G. Together, those two formulas, N = 1 and R = G, are the basis and guiding principles of the New Age of Innovation.
Here are 12 powerful ideas from the book--and these are from only the introduction and first chapter. Individually, these 12 brief points are interesting but hardly game-changers. But taken together, they will help business technology leaders grasp the scope of the challenges facing their companies as they need to adapt to the demands of a consumer-driven world that spans the globe.
The challenge goes way beyond server upgrades, network latency, version creep, and so forth--the real issue is that, as customers demand more involvement and more customization from companies they buy from, the old models and processes described by Prahalad and Krishnan cannot support the load. Sound familiar?
2. So too is skin care personalized by the Pond's Institute at Unilever. The Pond's Institute measures your skin conditions and seeks your views about how you want to look and feel. The company allows you to suggest your personal skin-care budget, to which the company responds by developing a recipe of products for you. It is your personal portfolio. You co-created it. (Introduction, p. 3)
Is your company pulling customers into co-creation opportunities? Does your company have the mind-set to do it? Does it have the technical infrastructure to support this? Do your executives encourage this type of new thinking, or do they stifle such discussions as being outside your core?